09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (3)<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Rotational Stability <strong>of</strong> Acrys<strong>of</strong> and Rayner Toric IOL<br />

Shetty Vijay (1) , Haldipurkar Suhas (1) , Singh Dhirendra (1) , Singh Setia<br />

Maninder (1) , Paik Anirban (1)<br />

1. Laxmi Eye Institute<br />

Aim: To evaluate rotational stability <strong>of</strong> Acrys<strong>of</strong> and Rayner toric IOL.<br />

Material and Methods: This prospective study done from Sept 2009 to Feb<br />

2010 included all patients implanted with Acrys<strong>of</strong> and Rayner toric IOLs.<br />

Intraoperative axis <strong>of</strong> placement was noted. Postoperative IOL axis was<br />

evaluated between 3 to 12 months on digital photograph using adobe<br />

photoshop s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Results: Twenty five eyes were implanted with Acrys<strong>of</strong> toric and 15 eyes were<br />

implanted with Rayner toric IOLs. Mean postoperative IOL rotation was 8.36<br />

and 6.44 degrees in Acrys<strong>of</strong> and Rayner toric IOLs respectively. Rotation <strong>of</strong><br />

Acrys<strong>of</strong> IOL <strong>of</strong> less than 5 degrees was seen in 16 eyes (64%), between 5 to<br />

10 degrees in 5 eyes (20%) and more than 10 degrees in 4 eyes (16%). IOL<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> Rayner IOL <strong>of</strong> less than 5 degrees was seen in 10 eyes (67%),<br />

between 5 to 10 degrees in 3 eyes (20%) and more than 10 degrees in 2 eyes<br />

(13%).<br />

Conclusion: Both Acrys<strong>of</strong> and Rayner toric IOLs demonstrate good rotation<br />

stability.<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (4)<br />

Toric IOL Implantation in Cataract Surgery: Femtosecond Laser vs.<br />

Manual Techniques<br />

Lawless Michael (1)<br />

1. Vision Eye Institute<br />

Objective: Standard outcomes from our first Toric IOLs implanted with laser<br />

cataract surgery to those using manual techniques.<br />

Methodology: 50 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with Toric IOL implantation<br />

had femtosecond laser or manually created capsulotomy/corneal incisions.<br />

Accuracy to target refraction and residual astigmatism were measured<br />

between groups at 1 month.<br />

Results: Both groups were well matched. The capsulotomy and laser incisions<br />

were created with exact dimension, which facilitated precise Toric IOL<br />

placement compared with the manual group. Mean residual cylinder was<br />

reduced in the both groups however the laser group provided an additional<br />

reduction.<br />

Conclusions: Laser corneal incisions increased the predictability <strong>of</strong> surgically<br />

induced astigmatism, improving the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the toric calculator. Precise<br />

diameter capsulotomy should further reduce tilt and lens decentration which is<br />

a factor in the outcome.<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (5)<br />

Implantation <strong>of</strong> the ReSTOR 3+ in Conjunction with Femtosecond<br />

Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery<br />

Lawless Michael (1)<br />

1. Vision Eye Institute<br />

Objective: To measure the standard visual and refractive outcomes <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

undergoing implantation <strong>of</strong> the ReSTOR 3+ multifocal IOL in conjunction with<br />

Femtosecond cataract surgery.<br />

Methodology: 50 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with ReSTOR 3+ were<br />

reviewed. Accuracy to target refraction and visual acuity was assessed.<br />

Results: The average spherical equivalent refraction was 0.00 ± 0.23Ds.<br />

85.7% <strong>of</strong> patients obtained UDVA <strong>of</strong> 6/7.5 and UNVA <strong>of</strong> N6 or better following<br />

surgery. There were no adverse events.<br />

Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> laser assisted cataract surgery and recent<br />

IOL technology serves to provide patients with excellent results following<br />

surgery. Surgeons can predict, with greater accuracy, the ability to provide<br />

spectacle independency using this combination <strong>of</strong> technology.<br />

62<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (6)<br />

Ray-Tracing and Gaussian Optics in IOL Calculation<br />

Haigis Wolfgang (1) , Koberstein Ulrike (1)<br />

1. University <strong>of</strong> Wuerzburg, Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology<br />

Objective / Purpose: Several authors have claimed that ray-tracing provides<br />

better refractive outcomes than classical IOL power formulas in Gaussian<br />

optics. To check this hypothesis the refractive outcomes after IOL implantation<br />

were retrospectively compared to predictions from ray-tracing as well as<br />

standard Gaussian optics.<br />

Methods: For 89 pseudophakic eyes <strong>of</strong> 89 routine cataract patients, the<br />

arithmetic (ME) and absolute (MA) prediction errors (achieved spherical<br />

equivalent (SEV) - predicted refraction) were determined using a commercial<br />

ray tracing s<strong>of</strong>tware (Okulix, O) as well as the Haigis (H) formula. Six different<br />

IOL types were implanted by 3 surgeons. For IOL calculation in Gaussian optics,<br />

the published ULIB lens constants were used; ray tracing was performed for<br />

a 3 mm pupil.<br />

Results: The mean arithmetic prediction error with ray-tracing was ME(O) =<br />

-0.56 ± 0.93 dpt, with Gaussian optics ME(H) = -0.19 ± 0.82 dpt. The medians<br />

<strong>of</strong> the absolute prediction errors were MA(O) = 0.65 dpt and MA(H) = 0.38<br />

dpt. The differences between ray-tracing and classical results were statistically<br />

significant (p< 0.001).<br />

Conclusions: Ray-tracing yielded no advantages in refractive outcomes over<br />

the Haigis formula. Classical Gaussian optics results, on the contrary, were<br />

significantly better than ray-tracing based predictions.<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (7)<br />

IOL Exchange. The Indications and Surgical Techniques<br />

Izak Milan (1) , Molnarova Maria (1) , Cizmarova-Izakova Andrea (1) ,<br />

Bartos Marcel (1)<br />

1. Eye Clinic, F.D. Roosevelt Hospital, Slovak Healthcare University<br />

Objective/Purpose: To describe the Incidence, Indications and Surgical<br />

techniques <strong>of</strong> IOL exchange through small incision.<br />

Methods: Comparison <strong>of</strong> the incidence and reasons for IOL explanation/<br />

exchange in the past (1979-1992) and in the presence (1993-2010).<br />

Results: While in the past the incidence <strong>of</strong> IOL explantation/exchange was<br />

1,7% /iris clip/, resp. 0,4% /PC IOL/currently the incidence is 0,08% only. The<br />

main reasons for IOL exchange in the past and in the present are discussed.<br />

Conclusion: We are the witnesses <strong>of</strong> a changing scene for IOL exchange. We<br />

look for the best surgical technique <strong>of</strong> IOL exchange through the small incision.<br />

The presentation is accompanied by a video.<br />

FP-CAT-TH 40 (8)<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> Thick Pupillary Membranes with Plasma Knife<br />

Singh Ravijit (1)<br />

1. Dr. Daljit Singh Eye Hospital<br />

Vascularized and non vascularized thick irido-capsular membranes are tough<br />

to manage with conventional cutting tools like the capsulotome , intraocular<br />

scissors or the vitrectomy cutter. These membranes can be sometimes very<br />

thick and tough or may be highly vascularized and bleed excessively on<br />

cutting. We present a paradigm shift in managing a variety <strong>of</strong> thick pupillary<br />

membranes by the use <strong>of</strong> a Plasma Knife (Fugo Blade) and we shall share<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> this devise in diverse clinical situations like congenital, traumatic,<br />

iatrogenic etc. Currently the Plasma Knife is US FDA approved for anterior<br />

capsulotomy and for Transciliary filtration for glaucoma.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!