09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

PO-CAT-21<br />

Visual Quality After Accommodative Intraocular Lens Implantation in<br />

Eyes with Previous Myopic Laser in Situ Keratomileusis<br />

Ho Jonathan C H (1) , Cheng Arthur C K (2) , Chan Clement W N (1) , Li Walton W<br />

T (2)<br />

1. Tung Wah Eastern Hospital<br />

2. Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital<br />

Purpose: Evaluate objective and subjective visual quality in eyes having<br />

accommodative intraocular lens (Acc IOL) implantation (Crystalens HD,<br />

Bausch and Lomb) after previous myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).<br />

Methods: Measure uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuities<br />

(UCDVA, UCIVA, UCNVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity, best-distance<br />

corrected intermediate and near visual acuity (BCDVA, DCIVA, DCNVA),<br />

deviation from target refraction, and ability to perform near and intermediate<br />

visual tasks.<br />

Results: The study comprised 9 eyes (8 patients; 4 men). The mean IOL power<br />

was 19.08 +/- 1.45 dioptres (D). Mean BCDVA, DCIVA and DCNVA at month<br />

3 were 1.02 +/- 0.11, 0.88 +/- 0.24 and 0.64 +/- 0.22 (M-notation) [c.f. J3]. 7<br />

(78%) eyes gained BCDVA and no eyes lost BCDVA. 8 (89%) eyes achieved<br />

DCNVA J3 or better at month 1. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent at<br />

month 3 was -1.25 +/- 1.27 D (c.f. pre-operative target -0.73 D). Most patients<br />

reported no or little difficulty in carrying out near and intermediate visual tasks,<br />

with 5 (62.5%) patients reported ‘moderate or above› level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction.<br />

Conclusion: Implantation <strong>of</strong> accommodative IOL in patients with myopic LASIK<br />

provides good distance, intermediate and reasonable near visual acuities, with<br />

predictable refractive outcome.<br />

PO-CAT-22<br />

Comparative study Postoperative Refractive Errors Due to<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> Axial Length for Combined Vitreous and Cataract<br />

Surgery<br />

Suzuki Yuka (1) , Oi Aya (1) , Kobayakawa Shinichiro (1) , Watanabe Hiroshi (1) ,<br />

Tochikubo Tetsuo (1)<br />

1. Toho University<br />

Purpose: To compare postoperative refractive errors due to calculation <strong>of</strong> axial<br />

length using partial aoherence laser interferometry and A-scan ultrasound<br />

(A-mode) for combined vitreous and cataract surgery.<br />

Method: The study indicate 82 eyes <strong>of</strong> 65 patients who underwent combined<br />

vitreous and phacoemulsification, 7mm optical diameter acrylic foldable intra<br />

ocular lens(IOL)?X-70®.? implantation .These surgeries were performed by<br />

same surgeon. Axial length was measured by using partial aoherence laser<br />

interferometry OA-1000TM and A-mode AL-3000 TM was used for cases that<br />

can’t measured by OA-1000TM in case <strong>of</strong> vitreous hemorrhage. IOL power<br />

was decided by SRK/T formula. The errors between the actual postoperative<br />

refraction at 1 week,1 month,3 months and 6 months and predicted refractions.<br />

Result: Postoperative refractive errors were -0.49±1.33D? -0.39±1.32D?-<br />

0.25±1.09D?-0.27±1.05D (OA-1000TM) ,and -1.12±1.10D? -1.10±1.36D?-<br />

1.00±1.43D?-0.84±1.33D(AL-3000 TM). Significant difference (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!