09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

FP-REF-TH 49 (5)<br />

Initial Experience and Refractive Outcomes with Optimized Prolate<br />

Ablation for Myopia and Astigmatism<br />

Abdel Fattah Tarek (1) , El-Danasoury Alaa (1)<br />

1. Magrabi Hospital<br />

Purpose: To present the initial experience, the refractive outcomes and<br />

induction <strong>of</strong> spherical aberration <strong>of</strong> the Nidek optimized prolate ablation (OPA).<br />

Method: This study presents 6 months postoperative data from one surgeon<br />

using OPA on 65 eyes. Patients treated for up to - 5.50 D <strong>of</strong> sphere and up<br />

to - 2.25 D <strong>of</strong> cylinder were included in the study. Standard refractive data and<br />

wavefront data were analyzed. Postoperative data at 6 months is presented.<br />

Results: Postoperatively, 100 percent <strong>of</strong> the patients had uncorrected visual<br />

acuity <strong>of</strong> 20/20 or better after OPA. No patients lost lines <strong>of</strong> best corrected<br />

visual acuity (BCVA) and 50% <strong>of</strong> eyes gained one line <strong>of</strong> BCVA. The mean<br />

manifest refractive spherical equivalent was 0.00 ± 0.20 D (range -0.63 D<br />

to 0.37 D). Sixth order ocular spherical aberration increased by +0.05 µm<br />

postoperatively.<br />

Conclusion: Initial experience with the OPA ablation algorithm indicates that<br />

treatments are efficacious and predictable with minimal increase in spherical<br />

aberration.<br />

FP-REF-TH 49 (6)<br />

NIDEK Optimized Prolate Ablation (OPA) and Presbyopia Optimized<br />

Prolate Ablation (Presby-OPA) Pr<strong>of</strong>iles in Lasik Myopic Correction<br />

Salaheldine Mostafa (1) , Salaheldine Yehia (2)<br />

1. Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Ofthalmology<br />

2. Cairo University<br />

Purpose: To report the ocular and corneal higher order aberrations and corneal<br />

asphericity <strong>of</strong> optimized prolate ablations for the treatment <strong>of</strong> myopia.<br />

Methods: 30 myopic patients were treated using myopic ablation for both eyes<br />

using the new ablation pr<strong>of</strong>iles, OPA for younger patients and PresbOPA<br />

for those older than 40 years. Predictability, Mean refraction MR,corrected<br />

distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate Visual Acuity<br />

(UCIVA),uncorrected near Visual Acuity(UCNVA) and corneal and ocular<br />

aberrations were analyzed out to 3 months postoperatively.<br />

Results: Mean preoperative root-mean-square (RMS) averaged 0.41D and<br />

mean preoperative spherical aberration (SA )averaged 0.124 microns. In<br />

presbyopia group, preoperative mean uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA)<br />

averaged 0.68 and preoperative mean uncorrected intermediate visual acuity<br />

(UCIVA ) 0.48 . At 3 months postoperatively, (RMS) <strong>of</strong> the total ocular higher<br />

order aberrations was 0.57 D. Ocular spherical aberration was -0.027 microns<br />

. In presbyopia group, mean UCNVA averaged 0.7 and mean UCIVA 0.5.<br />

Conclusions: Optimized prolate ablation-treated eyes had less induction <strong>of</strong><br />

higher order aberrations and spherical aberrations postoperatively and<br />

increases reading glasses independence in the presbyopic group.<br />

74<br />

FP-REF-TH 49 (7)<br />

The Efficacy, Predictability and Safety <strong>of</strong> Wavefront Guided<br />

Refractive Laser Treatment: A Meta-Analysis<br />

Suleman Hanif (1) , Fares Usama (1) , Al-Aqaba Mouhamed (1) , Otri Ahmed<br />

Muneer (1) , Dua Harminder Singh (1)<br />

1. Division <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences<br />

Purpose: We compared the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higherorder<br />

aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided (WG) and non-wavefrontguided(NWG)<br />

ablations.<br />

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the selection criteria<br />

were quality appraised and data extracted by two independent authors.<br />

Measures <strong>of</strong> association were pooled quantitatively using meta-analytical<br />

methods. The pooled odds ratio (POR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were<br />

computed in the domains <strong>of</strong> efficacy, safety and predictability. The weighted<br />

mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval were used to compare<br />

induced HOAs.<br />

Results: Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included.<br />

Efficacy: The POR <strong>of</strong> achieving uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) <strong>of</strong> 20/20 after<br />

WG was 1.10(CI: 0.66 to 1.83, p=0.72).<br />

Predictability: The POR <strong>of</strong> achieving a result within ±0.50 dioptres <strong>of</strong> intended<br />

target with WG was 1.03(CI: 0.60 to 1.75, p=0.92).<br />

Safety: No study reported loss in two or more lines <strong>of</strong> Snellen acuity in both<br />

modalities. The WMD <strong>of</strong> induced HOAs with WG was -0.09(CI: -0.17 to -0.01,<br />

p=0.04).<br />

Conclusions: We have found no clear evidence for any benefit <strong>of</strong> WG over<br />

NWG ablations. However, there is a lack <strong>of</strong> standardized reporting <strong>of</strong> levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> UCVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in WG treatment.<br />

FP-REF-TH 49 (8)<br />

Rolling and Z Movements Measured with the 6D Eye-Tracker <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SCHWIND AMARIS Total-Tech Laser<br />

Arbelaez Maria Clara (1) , Arba-Mosquera Samual (1)<br />

1. Muscat Eye Laser Center<br />

Purpose: To evaluate intraoperative dynamic eye rolling and z movements with<br />

6D Eye-Tracking using SCHWIND AMARIS.<br />

Setting: Muscat Eye Laser Center, Oman.<br />

Methods: Scleral-tracker images obtained during initial ablation were compared<br />

to late images to determine eye rolling and axial displacements. The difference<br />

between max and min displacement was taken as a metric <strong>of</strong> movement range.<br />

Mean, STDdev, and range were computed and expressed as % <strong>of</strong> treatments.<br />

Results: Successful registration occurred in 90% (52/58). Mean rolling was<br />

2±3° horizontally and -3±3° vertically. Mean rolling measurements were within<br />

5° in 78% horizontally and 70% vertically. Mean axial displacement was<br />

-295±455µm Mean axial displacement values were >1mm in 10%. Mean rolling<br />

range during treatment was 4±2° horizontally and 5±2° vertically. Horizontally,<br />

3% rolling ranges were >8°. Mean axial displacement was 460±271µm. 3% <strong>of</strong><br />

axial displacements were >1mm.<br />

Conclusions: 6D-eye-tracker is valuable because uncompensated rolling<br />

movements can induce decentrations (comatic aberrations), and<br />

uncompensated axial movements may induce undercorrections. We retrieved<br />

5° for œnatural-rolling, and observed patients push their heads back at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the treatment and return to a more level position during treatment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!