09.12.2012 Views

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

Table of Contents - WOC 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FP-STR-MO 412 (3)<br />

A Relationship between Hypermetropia and Exophoria in<br />

Asthenopia: Fact or Fallacy?<br />

Grim Millicent (1) , Samson Joserine (1)<br />

1. Gulf Eye Center<br />

Purpose: Determine the relationship between Hyperopia and Exophoria in<br />

higher intensity headaches and eyestrain when doing prolonged near work.<br />

Method: 100 consecutive new patients were analyzed. Von Graefe Method<br />

with Manifest Refraction (with Fogging technique) in place was done to 97<br />

subjects between 6 to 60 years <strong>of</strong> age using Phoropter, and biggest letter E<br />

<strong>of</strong> hand-held Snellen Chart at 16 inches / 40cm from the patient as target.<br />

With measuring prism <strong>of</strong> 15 prisms diopters base-In over the Right eye and<br />

dissociating vertical prism <strong>of</strong> 6 prism diopters over the Left eye. The patient was<br />

asked to report the target once vertically aligned upon rotating the measuring<br />

prism counter-clockwise. Endpoint was recorded.<br />

Result: More Hyperopic patients proved to be Exophoric at Near Vision,<br />

compared to Myopic patients. In 49 myopic patients seen, the ratio <strong>of</strong> Exophoria<br />

to Esophoria was 34:13, with 2 Orthophoric patients; whereas in 51 Hyperopic<br />

patients it was 48:2, with one Orthophoric patient.<br />

Conclusion: Results from these 100 subjects, had us conclude the significant<br />

relationship existing between Hyperopia and Exophoria which increases the<br />

intensity <strong>of</strong> headaches and eyestrain in a patient for near work needs. Convex<br />

lenses and convergence training will alleviate these asthenopic symptoms.<br />

FP-STR-MO 412 (4)<br />

Common Forms <strong>of</strong> Strabismus in an Eye Clinic in Southwest Nigeria<br />

Olusanya Bolutife (1) , Ayeni O. (2) , Fawole O. (2) , Baiyeroju A. (1)<br />

1. Department <strong>of</strong> Ophthalmology, University College Hospital, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Ibadan<br />

2. Department <strong>of</strong> Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University <strong>of</strong> Ibadan<br />

Objective: Strabismus occurs worldwide and is a disorder <strong>of</strong> public health<br />

significance because <strong>of</strong> its psychosocial impact and negative social prejudice.<br />

However, there is a dearth <strong>of</strong> information on the different forms <strong>of</strong> strabismus<br />

in Nigerian patients. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the common<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> strabismus among patients <strong>of</strong> an eye clinic in South Western Nigeria.<br />

Methods: Retrospective review <strong>of</strong> clinical records <strong>of</strong> 240 patients with<br />

strabismus seen between January 1999 and December 2008.<br />

Results: Prevalence <strong>of</strong> strabismus was 1.2%. Esotropia was more common<br />

than exotropia. Sensory strabismus was the commonest form <strong>of</strong> strabismus,<br />

occurring in 83 (34.5%) patients; while accommodative esotropia was found in<br />

only 5.8% patients.<br />

Conclusion: These results suggest that strabismus prevalence may be lower in<br />

Africans compared with other races, while accommodative esotropia appears<br />

to occur less commonly in Africans when compared to Caucasians.<br />

<strong>WOC</strong><strong>2012</strong> Abstract Book<br />

FP-STR-MO 412 (5)<br />

Next Generation Sequencing Identifies RYR1 Mutations in a<br />

Consanguineous Pedigree with Complete External Ophthalmoplegia<br />

Shaaban Sherin (1,2) , Andrews Caroline (1,3) , Demer Joseph (4,5) ,<br />

Engle Elizabeth (1,2,3)<br />

1. Neurology and Ophthalmology Departments, Children›s Hospital Boston<br />

2. Harvard Medical School<br />

3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute<br />

4. Ophthalmology, Neurology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University <strong>of</strong> California<br />

5. Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University <strong>of</strong><br />

California<br />

Objective: Utilize next-generation sequencing (NGS) to define the genetic<br />

etiology <strong>of</strong> ocular motility disorders.<br />

Methods: Recessive inheritance was expected in 15 consanguineous<br />

pedigrees segregating Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders (CCDDs)<br />

including Duane, CFEOM and Moebius. Array-based linkage, homozygosity<br />

analysis, and whole exome sequencing (WES) were performed. WES data<br />

was analyzed using GENOMEQUEST, focusing on regions <strong>of</strong> linkage or<br />

shared homozygosity. The results from one pedigree are presented as pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> feasibility.<br />

Results: A consanguineous Mexican pedigree included 3 affected individuals<br />

who presented with complete ophthalmoplegia, ptosis and facial diplegia<br />

in addition to developmental delays and hypotonia was studied. Linkage<br />

and homozygosity analysis highlighted a region on chromosome 19 shared<br />

by the 3 affected individuals. Filtering variants to exclude synonymous<br />

heterozygous changes and those present in dbSNP or 1000 genome projects<br />

revealed 2 homozygous mutations in conserved residues <strong>of</strong> the RYR1 gene<br />

that segregated with the affection in the pedigree and were predicted to be<br />

pathologic. RYR1 mutations have previously been reported to cause minicore<br />

disease with external ophthalmoplegia, which appears to be the clinical<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> our patients.<br />

Conclusion: Combining linkage, homozygosity analysis and NGS can delineate<br />

the genetic mutations underlying recessive disorders.<br />

FP-STR-MO 412 (6)<br />

Heredity as a Risk Factor for Comitant Strabismus<br />

Shaaban Sherin (1,2) , Andrews Caroline (1,2,3) , Mackinnon Sarah (1) , Hunter<br />

David (1,2) , Engle Elizabeth (1,2,3)<br />

1. Neurology and Ophthalmology Departments, Children›s Hospital Boston<br />

2. Harvard Medical School<br />

3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute<br />

Objective and Purpose: Investigate heredity as a risk factor for comitant<br />

strabismus.<br />

Methods: A cohort <strong>of</strong> comitant esotropia (ET) and exotropia (XT) probands was<br />

collected from Children’s Hospital Boston. Affection status <strong>of</strong> first, second<br />

and third degree relatives was investigated. Relatives were “affected with<br />

strabismus” if they had manifest or intermittent strabismus, latent strabismus<br />

>10?, or history <strong>of</strong> strabismus surgery; or were “affected with strabismusassociated<br />

condition (SAC)” if they had anisometropia, hyperopia, low-grade<br />

stereopsis or vertical strabismus.<br />

Results: The ET group (756 pedigrees) included probands with infantile,<br />

accommodative, intermittent, or manifest ET. The XT group (311 pedigrees)<br />

included infantile, intermittent, or manifest XT. Preliminary analysis (405<br />

probands (285 ET, 120 XT)) revealed 68% <strong>of</strong> ET probands (and 84% <strong>of</strong> XT<br />

probands) had > 1 relative with either strabismus or SAC. Subgroup analysis<br />

revealed the percentages <strong>of</strong> ET probands with >1 relative with strabismus<br />

were infantile 51%, accommodative 51%, intermittent 71% and manifest 66%.<br />

For XT patients the percentages <strong>of</strong> affected relatives were infantile 50%,<br />

intermittent 63% and manifest 78%.<br />

Conclusion: The strong family history in our cohort supports the heritability <strong>of</strong><br />

comitant strabismus and encourages studies towards undermining its genetic<br />

basis.<br />

429

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!