Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.7 What about power and political economy? 190 4.7.1 Which account of power and choice? 190 4.7.2 Should we prioritise analysing the political 193 economy? 4.8 Is the capability approach a liberal theory? 194 4.9 Why ‘human development’ is not the same idea 197 4.10 Can the capability approach change welfare 202 economics? 4.10.1 Welfare economics and the economics 203 discipline 4.10.2 Non-welfarism 204 4.10.3 Empirical possibilities and challenges 207 4.10.4 Towards a heterodox capabilitarian welfare 208 economics? 4.11 Taking stock 210 5. Which Future for the Capability Approach? 211 References 217 Index 251
Page 1 and 2: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7: Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9: 3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 12: To Roland, Aaron and Ischa
Page 15 and 16: 4 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Jus
Page 21 and 22: 10 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 61 and 62:
50 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 100 and 101:
3. Clarifications This chapter aim
Page 102 and 103:
3. Clarifications 91 There are at l
Page 104 and 105:
3. Clarifications 93 actually able
Page 106 and 107:
3. Clarifications 95 A third way in
Page 108 and 109:
3. Clarifications 97 specific capab
Page 110 and 111:
3. Clarifications 99 of the capabil
Page 112 and 113:
3. Clarifications 101 ignorant or c
Page 114 and 115:
3. Clarifications 103 (1985c, 201)
Page 116 and 117:
3. Clarifications 105 agency-freedo
Page 118 and 119:
3. Clarifications 107 philosopher,
Page 120 and 121:
3. Clarifications 109 choice-making
Page 122 and 123:
3. Clarifications 111 a fair requir
Page 124 and 125:
3. Clarifications 113 In the previ
Page 126 and 127:
3. Clarifications 115 this may expl
Page 128 and 129:
3. Clarifications 117 to say that l
Page 130 and 131:
3. Clarifications 119 or medical ca
Page 132 and 133:
3. Clarifications 121 applicability
Page 134 and 135:
3. Clarifications 123 For a philoso
Page 136 and 137:
3. Clarifications 125 Indeed, this
Page 138 and 139:
3. Clarifications 127 mental state.
Page 140 and 141:
3. Clarifications 129 The theoreti
Page 142 and 143:
3. Clarifications 131 the happiness
Page 144 and 145:
3. Clarifications 133 these phenome
Page 146 and 147:
3. Clarifications 135 interventions
Page 148 and 149:
3. Clarifications 137 brings to the
Page 150 and 151:
3. Clarifications 139 work. She und
Page 152 and 153:
3. Clarifications 141 not be as wid
Page 154 and 155:
3. Clarifications 143 interventions
Page 156 and 157:
3. Clarifications 145 not very suit
Page 158 and 159:
3. Clarifications 147 Third, in emp
Page 160 and 161:
3. Clarifications 149 from ethics).
Page 162 and 163:
3. Clarifications 151 general and a
Page 164 and 165:
3. Clarifications 153 In the previ
Page 166 and 167:
3. Clarifications 155 focus on ‘r
Page 168 and 169:
3. Clarifications 157 2010; Pogge 2
Page 170 and 171:
3. Clarifications 159 But the capab
Page 172 and 173:
3. Clarifications 161 people’s fr
Page 174 and 175:
3. Clarifications 163 human rights,
Page 176 and 177:
3. Clarifications 165 conceptualize
Page 178 and 179:
3. Clarifications 167 seeing a capa
Page 180 and 181:
4. Critiques and Debates In chapte
Page 182 and 183:
4. Critiques and Debates 171 elsewh
Page 184 and 185:
4. Critiques and Debates 173 Sen wa
Page 186 and 187:
4. Critiques and Debates 175 said o
Page 188 and 189:
4. Critiques and Debates 177 But wh
Page 190 and 191:
4. Critiques and Debates 179 on sit
Page 192 and 193:
4. Critiques and Debates 181 she is
Page 194 and 195:
4. Critiques and Debates 183 agents
Page 196 and 197:
4. Critiques and Debates 185 live t
Page 198 and 199:
4. Critiques and Debates 187 anothe
Page 200 and 201:
4. Critiques and Debates 189 to dif
Page 202 and 203:
4. Critiques and Debates 191 choice
Page 204 and 205:
4. Critiques and Debates 193 intere
Page 206 and 207:
4. Critiques and Debates 195 shape
Page 208 and 209:
4. Critiques and Debates 197 than t
Page 210 and 211:
4. Critiques and Debates 199 there
Page 212 and 213:
4. Critiques and Debates 201 policy
Page 214 and 215:
4. Critiques and Debates 203 Befor
Page 216 and 217:
4. Critiques and Debates 205 (e.g.
Page 218 and 219:
4. Critiques and Debates 207 When
Page 220 and 221:
4. Critiques and Debates 209 hetero
Page 222 and 223:
5. Which Future for the Capability
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
References Addabbo, Tindara, Diego
Page 230 and 231:
References 219 Arneson, Richard. 20
Page 232 and 233:
References 221 Burchardt, Tania. 20
Page 234 and 235:
References 223 Coast, Joanna, Terry
Page 236 and 237:
References 225 Drèze, Jean and Ama
Page 238 and 239:
References 227 Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko.
Page 240 and 241:
References 229 Hart, Caroline S. 20
Page 242 and 243:
References 231 Khader, Serene J. 20
Page 244 and 245:
References 233 Lessmann, Ortrud and
Page 246 and 247:
References 235 Nussbaum, Martha C.
Page 248 and 249:
References 237 Peppin Vaughan, Rosi
Page 250 and 251:
References 239 Richardson, Henry S.
Page 252 and 253:
References 241 Ruger, Jennifer Prah
Page 254 and 255:
References 243 Sen, Amartya. 1992c.
Page 256 and 257:
References 245 Sumner, Leonard Wayn
Page 258 and 259:
References 247 Venkatapuram, Sridha
Page 260:
References 249 Woolley, Frances R.
Page 263 and 264:
252 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?