Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 227 Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2003. ‘The Human Development Paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s Ideas on Capabilities’. Feminist Economics 9 (2–3), 301–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077980 Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2009. ‘Human Rights and Human Development’. In Arguments for a Better World. Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume II: Society, Institutions, and Development, edited by Kaushik Basu and Ravi Kanbur, pp. 76–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780199239979.003.0006 Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2011. ‘The Metrics of Human Rights: Complementarities of the Human Development and Capabilities Approach’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12 (1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829. 2011.541750 Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and A. K. Shiva Kumar. 2003. ‘Introduction’. In Readings in Human Development, edited by Sakiko Fukuda-Parr and A. K. Shiva Kumar, pp. xxi–xxxi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Gaertner, Wulf. 2009. A Primer in Social Choice Theory: Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gaertner, Wulf and Yongsheng Xu. 2006. ‘Capability Sets as the Basis of a New Measure of Human Development’. Journal of Human Development 7 (3), 311– 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600815891 Gaertner, Wulf and Yongsheng Xu. 2008. ‘A New Class of Measures of the Standard of Living Based on Functionings’. Economic Theory 35 (2), 201–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0229-4 Gandjour, Afschin. 2008. ‘Mutual Dependency between Capabilities and Functionings in Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach’. Social Choice and Welfare 31 (2), 345–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0283-7 Gasper, Des. 1997. ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Nussbaum’s Capabilities Ethic’. Journal of International Development 9 (2), 281–302. https://doi. org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1328(199703)9:2%3C281::aid-jid438%3E3.0.co;2-k Gasper, Des. 2004. The Ethics of Development. From Economism to Human Development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Gasper, Des. 2007. ‘What Is the Capability Approach? Its Core, Rationale, Partners and Dangers’. The Journal of Socio-Economics 36, 335–59. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.001 Gasper, Des. 2010. ‘Understanding the Diversity of Conceptions of Wellbeing and Quality of Life’. The Journal of Socio-Economics 39 (3), 351–60. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006 Gasper, Des and Irene Van Staveren. 2003. ‘Development as Freedom — and as What Else?’ Feminist Economics 9 (2–3), 137–61. https://doi. org/10.1080/1354570032000078663 Gheaus, Anca. 2011. ‘Arguments for Nonparental Care for Children’. Social Theory and Practice 37 (3), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201137328
228 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice Gheaus, Anca and Ingrid Robeyns. 2011. ‘Equality-Promoting Parental Leave’. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2), 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9833.2011.01525.x Gilabert, Pablo. 2009. ‘The Feasibility of Basic Socioeconomic Human Rights: A Conceptual Exploration’. The Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237), 659–81. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.590.x Gilabert, Pablo. 2013. ‘The Capability Approach and the Debate between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey’. Human Rights Review 14 (4), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013- 0269-z Gill, Kaveri. 2010. Of Poverty and Plastic. Scavenging and Scrap Trading Entrepreneurs in India’s Urban Informal Economy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198060864.001.0001 Gore, Charles. 1997. ‘Irreducibly Social Goods and the Informational Basis of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach’. Journal of International Development 9 (2), 235–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1328(199703)9:2%3C235::aidjid436%3E3.0.co;2-j Gore, Charles. 2000. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries’. World Development 28 (5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00160-6 Gotoh, Reiko, Kotaro Suzumura and Naoki Yoshihara. 2005. ‘Extended Social Ordering Functions for Rationalizing Fair Allocation Rules as Game Forms in the Sense of Rawls and Sen’. International Journal of Economic Theory 1 (1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2005.00003.x Gotoh, Reiko and Naoki Yoshihara. 2003. ‘A class of fair distribution rules à la Rawls and Sen’. Economic Theory 22 (1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00199-002-0280-0 Grewal, Ini, Jane Lewis, Terry Flynn, Jackie Brown, John Bond and Joanna Coast. 2006. ‘Developing Attributes for a Generic Quality of Life Measure for Older People: Preferences or Capabilities?’ Social Science & Medicine 62 (8), 1891–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.023 Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826339 Hagerty, Michael R., Robert A. Cummins, Abbott L. Ferriss, Kenneth Land, Alex C. Michalos, Mark Peterson, Andrew Sharpe, Joseph Sirgy and Joachim Vogel. 2001. ‘Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research’. Social Indicators Research 55 (1), 1–96. https://doi. org/10.1023/a:1010811312332 Harnacke, Caroline. 2013. ‘Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention’. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41 (4), 768–80. https://doi. org/10.1111/jlme.12088
Page 1 and 2:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9:
3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 10:
4.7 What about power and political
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements In 1998, when I st
Page 16 and 17:
Acknowledgements 5 the capability a
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction Many people who en
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction 9 capability approa
Page 22 and 23:
1. Introduction 11 Moreover, it bri
Page 24 and 25:
1. Introduction 13 Countries Outsi
Page 26 and 27:
1. Introduction 15 capabilities of
Page 28 and 29:
1. Introduction 17 their collaborat
Page 30 and 31:
1. Introduction 19 This book has a
Page 32 and 33:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework Th
Page 34 and 35:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework 23
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
90 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188: 176 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 237: 226 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 262 and 263: Index abortion 15, 145 advantage 25
Page 264 and 265: Index 253 Fleurbaey, Marc 154 flour
Page 266 and 267: Index 255 political institutions 14
Page 268: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?