06.09.2021 Views

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Clarifications<br />

153<br />

<br />

In the previous section I gave a very brief account of the philosophical<br />

literature on theories of justice. What contribution can the capability<br />

approach make to this field? <strong>The</strong> first thing to note is that Martha<br />

Nussbaum has written at great length developing a capabilities theory<br />

of justice (e.g. Nussbaum 1988, 1992, Nussbaum 2000, 2002a; Nussbaum<br />

2006b). Her capabilities theory is the most detailed capability theory of<br />

justice that has been developed up till now. Her theory is comprehensive,<br />

in the sense that it is not limited to an account of political justice, or to<br />

liberal democracies. Her account holds for all human beings on earth,<br />

independently of whether they are living in a liberal democratic regime,<br />

or of whether they are severely disabled. However, Nussbaum’s theory<br />

of social justice doesn’t amount to a full theory of social justice. <strong>The</strong><br />

main demarcation of Nussbaum’s account is that it provides only “a<br />

partial <strong>and</strong> minimal account of social justice” (Nussbaum 2006b, 71)<br />

by specifying thresholds of a list of capabilities that governments in all<br />

nations should guarantee to their citizens. Nussbaum’s theory focuses<br />

on thresholds, but this does not imply that reaching these thresholds is<br />

all that matters for social justice; rather, her theory is partial <strong>and</strong> simply<br />

doesn’t discuss the question of what social justice requires once those<br />

thresholds are met. Not discussing certain things is not necessarily a<br />

flaw of a theory: this may be theoretical work that Nussbaum will do<br />

in the future, or it may be work that will be done by other scholars.<br />

Moreover, it is quite possible that Nussbaum’s account of partial justice<br />

is consistent with several accounts of what justice requires above the<br />

thresholds.<br />

Yet, while Nussbaum’s theory of justice has been worked out in<br />

great detail <strong>and</strong> has received a lot of attention, it would be a grave<br />

mistake to think that there can be only one capability theory of justice.<br />

On the contrary, the open nature of the capability framework allows<br />

for the development of a family of capability theories of justice. This<br />

then prompts the question: what is needed if we want to create such a<br />

capability theory of justice? 22<br />

22 I have presented this overview of steps that need to be taken in earlier publications<br />

(e.g. Robeyns 2016d).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!