Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. Clarifications<br />
153<br />
<br />
In the previous section I gave a very brief account of the philosophical<br />
literature on theories of justice. What contribution can the capability<br />
approach make to this field? <strong>The</strong> first thing to note is that Martha<br />
Nussbaum has written at great length developing a capabilities theory<br />
of justice (e.g. Nussbaum 1988, 1992, Nussbaum 2000, 2002a; Nussbaum<br />
2006b). Her capabilities theory is the most detailed capability theory of<br />
justice that has been developed up till now. Her theory is comprehensive,<br />
in the sense that it is not limited to an account of political justice, or to<br />
liberal democracies. Her account holds for all human beings on earth,<br />
independently of whether they are living in a liberal democratic regime,<br />
or of whether they are severely disabled. However, Nussbaum’s theory<br />
of social justice doesn’t amount to a full theory of social justice. <strong>The</strong><br />
main demarcation of Nussbaum’s account is that it provides only “a<br />
partial <strong>and</strong> minimal account of social justice” (Nussbaum 2006b, 71)<br />
by specifying thresholds of a list of capabilities that governments in all<br />
nations should guarantee to their citizens. Nussbaum’s theory focuses<br />
on thresholds, but this does not imply that reaching these thresholds is<br />
all that matters for social justice; rather, her theory is partial <strong>and</strong> simply<br />
doesn’t discuss the question of what social justice requires once those<br />
thresholds are met. Not discussing certain things is not necessarily a<br />
flaw of a theory: this may be theoretical work that Nussbaum will do<br />
in the future, or it may be work that will be done by other scholars.<br />
Moreover, it is quite possible that Nussbaum’s account of partial justice<br />
is consistent with several accounts of what justice requires above the<br />
thresholds.<br />
Yet, while Nussbaum’s theory of justice has been worked out in<br />
great detail <strong>and</strong> has received a lot of attention, it would be a grave<br />
mistake to think that there can be only one capability theory of justice.<br />
On the contrary, the open nature of the capability framework allows<br />
for the development of a family of capability theories of justice. This<br />
then prompts the question: what is needed if we want to create such a<br />
capability theory of justice? 22<br />
22 I have presented this overview of steps that need to be taken in earlier publications<br />
(e.g. Robeyns 2016d).