Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 221 Burchardt, Tania. 2006. ‘Happiness and Social Policy: Barking up the Right Tree in the Wrong Neck of the Woods’. In Social Policy Review 18: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2006, edited by Linda Bauld, Karen Clarke and Tony Maltby, pp. 144–59. Bristol: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/ policypress/9781861348449.003.0008 Burchardt, Tania. 2009. ‘Agency Goals, Adaptation and Capability Sets’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 10 (1), 3–19. https://doi. org/10.1080/14649880802675044 Burchardt, Tania. 2010. ‘Time, Income and Substantive Freedom: A Capability Approach’. Time & Society 19 (3), 318–44. https://doi. org/10.1177/0961463x10369754 Burchardt, Tania and Polly Vizard. 2011. ‘“Operationalizing” the Capability Approach as a Basis for Equality and Human Rights Monitoring in Twentyfirst-century Britain’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12 (1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541790 Byskov, Morten Fibieger. Forthcoming. ‘Methods for the Selection of Capabilities and Functionings’. In New Frontiers of the Capability Approach, edited by Flavio Comim, Shailaja Fennel and P. B. Anand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Byskov, Morten Fibieger. 2017. ‘Democracy, Philosophy, and the Selection of Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 18 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2015.1091809 Caney, Simon. 2016. ‘The Struggle for Climate Justice in a Non-Ideal World’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12044 Canoy, Marcel, Frédéric Lerais and Erik Schokkaert. 2010. ‘Applying the Capability Approach to Policy-Making: The Impact Assessment of the EU- Proposal on Organ Donation’. The Journal of Socio-Economics 39 (3), 391–99. Carter, Ian. 2014. ‘Is the Capability Approach Paternalist?’ Economics and Philosophy 30 (1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000054 Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica. 1994. ‘A New Approach to Evaluation of Wellbeing and Poverty by Fuzzy Set Theory’. Giornale Degli Economisti E Annali Di Economia 7 (9), 367–88. Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica. 2000. ‘A Multidimensional Assessment of Wellbeing Based on Sen’s Functioning Approach’. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali 108 (2), 207–39. Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica. 2006. ‘Capability Approach and Fuzzy Set Theory: Description, Aggregation and Inference Issues’. In Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, edited by Chille Lemmi and Gianni Betti, pp. 93–113. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387- 34251-1_6
222 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica. 2008. ‘Complexity and Vagueness in the Capability Approach: Strength or Weakness?’ In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures, Applications, edited by Flavio Comim, Mozaffar Qizilbash and Sabina Alkire, pp. 268–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511492587.010 Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica and José Manuel Roche. 2009. ‘Operationalization of the Capability Approach, from Theory to Practice: A Review of Techniques and Empirical Applications’. In Debating Global Society. Reach and Limit of the Capability Approach, edited by Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti, pp. 157–201. Milan: Feltrinelli. Claassen, Rutger. 2009. ‘Institutional Pluralism and the Limits of the Market’. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 8 (4), 420–47. https://doi. org/10.1177/1470594x09345479 Claassen, Rutger. 2011. ‘Making Capability Lists: Philosophy versus Democracy’. Political Studies 59 (3), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9248.2010.00862.x Claassen, Rutger. 2014. ‘Capability Paternalism’. Economics and Philosophy 30 (1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267114000042 Claassen, Rutger. 2015. ‘The Capability to Hold Property’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16 (2), 220–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829 .2014.939061 Claassen, Rutger. 2016. ‘An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice’. European Journal of Philosophy 24 (3), Early View. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12195 Claassen, Rutger and Marcus Düwell. 2013. ‘The Foundations of Capability Theory: Comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9361-8 Clark, David A. 2002. Visions of Development: A Study of Human Values. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Clark, David A. 2005. ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and the Many Spaces of Human Wellbeing’. The Journal of Development Studies 41 (8), 1339–68. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00220380500186853 Clark, David A. 2009. ‘Adaptation, Poverty and Well-being: Some Issues and Observations with Special Reference to the Capability Approach and Development Studies’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 10 (1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880802675051 Clark, David A. and Mozaffar Qizilbash. 2005. ‘Core Poverty, Basic Capabilities and Vagueness: An Application to the South African Context’, Global Poverty Research Group Working Paper Series, 26. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/ objects/uuid:3d2942da-fdce-47a0-880c-80591fe85d8c
Page 1 and 2:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9:
3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 10:
4.7 What about power and political
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements In 1998, when I st
Page 16 and 17:
Acknowledgements 5 the capability a
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction Many people who en
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction 9 capability approa
Page 22 and 23:
1. Introduction 11 Moreover, it bri
Page 24 and 25:
1. Introduction 13 Countries Outsi
Page 26 and 27:
1. Introduction 15 capabilities of
Page 28 and 29:
1. Introduction 17 their collaborat
Page 30 and 31:
1. Introduction 19 This book has a
Page 32 and 33:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework Th
Page 34 and 35:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework 23
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
90 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182: 170 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 231: 220 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 262 and 263: Index abortion 15, 145 advantage 25
Page 264 and 265: Index 253 Fleurbaey, Marc 154 flour
Page 266 and 267: Index 255 political institutions 14
Page 268: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?