Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
214 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
place. <strong>The</strong> capability approach may well form the nexus connecting<br />
existing disciplinary frameworks, precisely because its concepts bring<br />
together people’s wellbeing <strong>and</strong> the material resources they have, the<br />
legal rules <strong>and</strong> social norms that constrain their capability sets, <strong>and</strong> so<br />
forth. <strong>The</strong> approach thereby offers important conceptual <strong>and</strong> theoretical<br />
bridges between disciplines. And it could also link evaluative <strong>and</strong><br />
normative frameworks to descriptive <strong>and</strong> explanatory frameworks,<br />
rather than leaving the normative frameworks implicit, as is now too<br />
often done in the social sciences.<br />
Fourth, the capability approach should be more extensively used in<br />
designing new policy tools. Citizens who endorse a broad underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
of the quality of life that gives non-material aspects a central place have<br />
been annoyed for many years by the constant assessment of economic<br />
growth as an end in itself, rather than as a means to human flourishing<br />
<strong>and</strong> the meeting of human needs. <strong>The</strong>y have been saying, rightly in my<br />
view, that whether economic growth is a good thing depends, among<br />
other things, on how it affects the overall quality of life of people, as<br />
well as how other public values fare, such as ecological sustainability,<br />
<strong>and</strong> that we have very good reasons to take seriously the limits to<br />
economic growth (Jackson 2016). But those who want to put the ends of<br />
policies at the centre of the debate, <strong>and</strong> focus policy discussions more<br />
on these ultimate ends rather than on means, need to move from mere<br />
critique to developing tools that can fashion constructive proposals.<br />
<strong>The</strong> alternatives to GDP, which I briefly discussed in chapter 1, are one<br />
element that can help, but other tools are also needed.<br />
Fifth, we have to investigate which capability theories are logically<br />
possible, but empirically implausible. <strong>The</strong> argument in this book has<br />
been that the capability approach can be developed in a wide range of<br />
capability theories <strong>and</strong> applications, <strong>and</strong> is not committed to a particular<br />
set of political or ideological commitments. But that is as far as its logical<br />
structures go, <strong>and</strong> it doesn’t take a stance on empirical soundness. We<br />
need to investigate which capability theories may be logically possible,<br />
but nevertheless should be ruled out, given what we know about<br />
the plausibility of our empirical assumptions regarding conversion<br />
factors, human diversity, <strong>and</strong> structural constraints. It is highly likely<br />
that there are capability theories that are logically conceivable, yet<br />
inconsistent with some ‘basic facts’ about human nature <strong>and</strong> societies.