Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. Core Ideas <strong>and</strong> the Framework<br />
65<br />
<br />
<strong>The</strong> fifth B-module is the account of structural constraints: the institutions,<br />
policies, laws, social norms <strong>and</strong> so forth, that people in different social<br />
positions face. Those differences in the structural constraints that people<br />
face can have a great influence on their conversion factors, <strong>and</strong> hence<br />
on their capability sets. For example, if relationships between people<br />
of the same sex are criminalised, then gay people may have all the<br />
means <strong>and</strong> resources they would wish, but they will still not be able to<br />
enjoy a happy family life. Or if people of colour face explicit or implicit<br />
discrimination on the labour market, then they will not be able to use<br />
the same labour-market resources (their degrees, training, experience)<br />
to generate the same levels of capabilities in the professional sphere of<br />
life, compared with groups that face no (or less) discrimination.<br />
In addition, structural constraints also play a role in the shaping<br />
of people’s capabilities that are not heavily dependent on material<br />
resources. If one group of people is, for cultural, historical or religious<br />
reasons, stigmatized as outcasts, then they will be treated with<br />
disrespect by other groups in society. <strong>The</strong> same holds for all groups<br />
that suffer from stigma, such as, for example, people with psychiatric<br />
disorders or other mental health issues. <strong>The</strong>se structural constraints will<br />
also affect the capabilities that do not rely on resources directly, such as<br />
opportunities for friendships or for a healthy sense of self-confidence.<br />
Which of those structural constraints will be important for a<br />
particular capability analysis will depend on the context. For example,<br />
in her study of the living st<strong>and</strong>ards of waste pickers, scavengers, <strong>and</strong><br />
plastic recycling <strong>and</strong> scrap trading entrepreneurs in Delhi, Kaveri Gill<br />
(2010) showed that caste plays a very important role in the capability<br />
sets of different castes. For example, those at the very bottom of the<br />
hierarchical ladder of waste workers — the waste pickers — have no<br />
opportunities for upward mobility due to social norms <strong>and</strong> societal<br />
discrimination related to their caste. In this study, social norms related<br />
to caste are key as a structural constraint; in other studies, it may be the<br />
anatomy of twenty-first century capitalism, or gender norms in genderstratified<br />
societies, or some other set of structural constraints.