Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 219 Arneson, Richard. 2013. ‘From Primary Goods to Capabilities to Wellbeing’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2), 179–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757910 Arrow, Kenneth J., Amartya Sen and Kotaro Suzumura. 2002. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Arrow, Kenneth J., Amartya Sen and Kotaro Suzumura. 2010. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Atkinson, Anthony B. 1999. ‘The Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics’. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (2), 173–90. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9442.00151 Atkinson, Anthony B. 2001. ‘The Strange Disappearance of Welfare Economics’. Kyklos 54 (2-3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00148 Atkinson, Anthony B. 2009. ‘Economics as a Moral Science’. Economica 76, 791– 804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00788.x Barclay, Linda. 2003. ‘What Kind of Liberal Is Martha Nussbaum?’ SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 4 (2), 5–24. Barclay, Linda. 2016. ‘The Importance of Equal Respect: What the Capabilities Approach Can and Should Learn from Human Rights Law’. Political Studies 64 (2), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12175 Barry, Brian. 1995. Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barry, Brian. 2005. Why Social Justice Matters. Cambridge: Polity. Barry, Brian and Matt Matravers. 2011. ‘Justice’. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/justice/v-1 Basu, Kaushik. 1987. ‘Achievements, Capabilities and the Concept of Wellbeing’. Social Choice and Welfare 4 (1), 69–76. Basu, Kaushik and Luis López-Calva. 2011. ‘Functionings and Capabilities’. In Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edited by Kenneth Arrow, Amartya Sen and Kotaro Suzumura, 2, pp. 153–87. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0169-7218(10)00016-x Baujard, Antoinette and Muriel Gilardone. 2017. ‘Sen Is Not a Capability Theorist’. Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.10 80/1350178x.2016.1257821 Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Béteille, André. 1993. ‘Amartya Sen’s Utopia’. Economic and Political Weekly 28 (16), 753–56. Bhanu Mehta, Pratap. 2009. ‘“Doing” Justice’. Outlook India, 17 August 2009. http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/doing-justice/261172
220 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice Bhargava, Rajeev. 1992. Individualism in Social Science. Forms and Limits of a Methodology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Binder, Christina and Constanze Binder. 2016. ‘A Capability Perspective on Indigenous Autonomy’. Oxford Development Studies, 44 (3), 297–314. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1167178 Bleichrodt, Han and John Quiggin. 2013. ‘Capabilities as Menus: A Non- Welfarist Basis for QALY Evaluation’. Journal of Health Economics 32 (1), 128– 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.004 Bockstael, Erika and Krushil Watene. 2016. ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Capability Approach: Taking Stock’. Oxford Development Studies 44 (3), 265– 70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1204435 Boelhouwer, Jeroen. 2002. ‘Quality of Life and Living Conditions in the Netherlands’. Social Indicators Research 58 (1–3), 113–38. Boelhouwer, Jeroen and Ineke Stoop. 1999. ‘Measuring Wellbeing in the Netherlands: The SCP Index from 1974 to 1997’. Social Indicators Research 48 (1), 51–75. Boni, Alejandra and Melanie Walker. 2013. Human Development and Capabilities: Re-Imagining the University of the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075081 Boulding, Kenneth E. 1969. ‘Economics as a Moral Science’. The American Economic Review 59 (1), 1–12. Braber, Collin den. 2013. ‘The Introduction of the Capability Approach in Social Work across a Neoliberal Europe’. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 22 (4), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.380 Brighouse, Harry. 2006. On Education. London: Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203390740 Brighouse, Harry and Ingrid Robeyns. 2010. Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi. org/10.1017/cbo9780511810916 Brock, Gillian and Soran Reader. 2002. ‘Needs-Centered Ethical Theory’. The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4), 425–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021910832459 Browne, Jude and Marc Stears. 2005. ‘Capabilities, Resources, and Systematic Injustice: A Case of Gender Inequality’. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4 (3), 355–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x05056608 Burchardt, Tania. 2004. ‘Capabilities and Disability: The Capabilities Framework and the Social Model of Disability’. Disability & Society 19 (7), 735–51. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000284213 Burchardt, Tania. 2005. ‘Are One Man’s Rags Another Man’s Riches? Identifying Adaptive Expectations Using Panel Data’. Social Indicators Research 74 (1), 57–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6519-y
Page 1 and 2:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9:
3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 10:
4.7 What about power and political
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements In 1998, when I st
Page 16 and 17:
Acknowledgements 5 the capability a
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction Many people who en
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction 9 capability approa
Page 22 and 23:
1. Introduction 11 Moreover, it bri
Page 24 and 25:
1. Introduction 13 Countries Outsi
Page 26 and 27:
1. Introduction 15 capabilities of
Page 28 and 29:
1. Introduction 17 their collaborat
Page 30 and 31:
1. Introduction 19 This book has a
Page 32 and 33:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework Th
Page 34 and 35:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework 23
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
90 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180: 168 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 229: 218 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 262 and 263: Index abortion 15, 145 advantage 25
Page 264 and 265: Index 253 Fleurbaey, Marc 154 flour
Page 266 and 267: Index 255 political institutions 14
Page 268: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?