Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
128 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
In the happiness approach, life satisfaction is understood as a concept<br />
that combines two components: how we normally feel in everyday<br />
life — the affective or ‘hedonistic’ component — <strong>and</strong> how we judge<br />
the degree to which our preferences <strong>and</strong> aspirations in life have been<br />
realised — the cognitive component. In order to find out how ‘happy’<br />
a person is, respondents are asked, for example, to rate how satisfied<br />
they are with their life on a scale from 1 to 10 (to measure the cognitive<br />
component) <strong>and</strong> to report their mood at particular moments of the day,<br />
sometimes even with the aid of a buzzer set to go off at r<strong>and</strong>om times (to<br />
measure the affective component). In another method, the respondents<br />
are asked to imagine the worst possible life <strong>and</strong> to give that life a value<br />
of 0, to imagine the best possible life <strong>and</strong> give that a value of 10, <strong>and</strong> then<br />
to rate their own life on a scale from 0 to 10.<br />
<strong>The</strong> view in the happiness literature is that overall life satisfaction<br />
should be adopted as the official ‘policy guide’, <strong>and</strong> the task of the<br />
government is to aim for the highest possible average level of life<br />
satisfaction (Hagerty et al. 2001; Layard 2011). For comparisons in the<br />
long term, Ruut Veenhoven also proposes to measure the quality of<br />
life based on ‘happy life expectancy’. This is an index obtained from<br />
multiplying life expectancy in a country with average overall life<br />
satisfaction (Veenhoven 1996).<br />
Is the happiness approach, or the SWB approach, the best basis for<br />
thinking about wellbeing <strong>and</strong> the quality of life, especially against the<br />
background of policy design? <strong>The</strong> happiness approach certainly has a<br />
number of attractive features. Firstly, it puts the human being centre stage,<br />
rather than focusing on the means that human beings use to improve<br />
their quality of life. Hence the approach satisfies the core criterion from<br />
module A that means <strong>and</strong> ends should not be conceptually confused.<br />
Secondly, in considering the means to happiness, the subjective approach<br />
is not limited to material means, which is the major shortcoming of the<br />
dominant economic empirical methods. Income has only a limited (but<br />
not unimportant) role to play in generating happiness.<br />
In conclusion, the happiness approach does have some significant<br />
strengths, but it also gives rise to some concerns. We will briefly discuss<br />
the main theoretical problem, <strong>and</strong> then look in more detail at the worries<br />
raised for empirical research <strong>and</strong> policy making.