Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 237 Peppin Vaughan, Rosie and Melanie Walker. 2012. ‘Capabilities, Values and Education Policy’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 13 (3), 495– 512. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.679648 Pettit, Philip. 2001. ‘Capability and Freedom: A Defence of Sen’. Economics and Philosophy 17 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267101000116 Pettit, Philip. 2003. ‘Agency-Freedom and Option-Freedom’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803154003 Pettit, Philip. 2009. ‘Freedom in the Spirit of Sen’. In Amartya Sen, edited by Christopher W. Morris, pp. 91–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511800511.006 Phillips, Anne. 2004. ‘Defending Equality of Outcome’. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00188.x Phipps, Shelley. 2002. ‘The Well-Being of Young Canadian Children in International Perspective: A Functionings Approach’. Review of Income and Wealth 48 (4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4991.00065 Phipps, Shelley and Peter Burton. 1995. ‘Sharing within Families: Implications for the Measurement of Poverty among Individuals in Canada’. Canadian Journal of Economics 28(1), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/136028 Pierik, Roland. 2012. ‘State Neutrality and the Limits of Religious Symbolism’. In The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public School Classroom, edited by Jeroen Temperman, pp. 201–18. Leiden: Brill/Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004222519_010 Pierik, Roland and Wibren van der Burg. 2011. ‘The Neutral State and the Mandatory Crucifix’. Religion & Human Rights 6 (3), 267–72. https://doi. org/10.1163/187103211x599427 Pierik, Roland and Ingrid Robeyns. 2007. ‘Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory’. Political Studies 55 (1), 133–52. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00646.x Pogge, Thomas W. 2002. ‘Can the Capability Approach Be Justified?’ Philosophical Topics 30 (2), 167–228. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics200230216 Pogge, Thomas W. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity. Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 1996. ‘Capabilities, Well-being and Human Development: A Survey’. The Journal of Development Studies 33 (2), 143–62. https://doi. org/10.1080/00220389608422460 Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2002. ‘A Note on the Measurement of Poverty and Vulnerability in the South African Context’. Journal of International Development 14 (6), 757–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.922 Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2005. ‘Sen on Freedom and Gender Justice’. Feminist Economics 11 (3), 151–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700500301551
238 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2011. ‘Disability and Human Development’. In Arguing about the World: The Work and Legacy of Meghnad Desai, edited by Mary Kaldor and Polly Vizard, pp. 99–118. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi. org/10.5040/9781849665469 Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2012. ‘The Capability Approach: Its Interpretations and Limitations’. In The Capability Approach. Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asian-Pacific Region, edited by Francesca Panzironi and Katharine Gelber, pp. 9–22. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116159 Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2013. ‘On Capability and the Good Life: Theoretical Debates and Their Practical Implications’. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 31 (2), 35–42. Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2016. ‘Capability, Objectivity and “False Consciousness”: On Sen, Marx and JS Mill’. International Journal of Social Economics 43 (12), 1207–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-04-2016-0127 Qizilbash, Mozaffar and David A. Clark. 2005. ‘The Capability Approach and Fuzzy Poverty Measures: An Application to the South African Context’. Social Indicators Research 74 (1), 103–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005- 6527-y Rabinowicz, Wlodek and Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen. 2000. ‘A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and For Its Own Sake’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9264.00064 Rauschmayer, Felix, Ines Omann and Johannes Frühmann. 2012. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, Needs, and Wellbeing. London: Routledge. Rawls, John. 1988. ‘The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 17(4), 251–76. Rawls, John. 1999. Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John. 2009. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reader, Soran. 2006. ‘Does a Basic Needs Approach Need Capabilities?’ Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3), 337–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9760.2006.00259.x Reader, Soran and Gillian Brock. 2004. ‘Needs, Moral Demands and Moral Theory’. Utilitas 16 (3), 251–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820804001165 Reddy, Sanjay G., Sujata Visaria and Muhammad Asali. 2009. ‘Inter-Country Comparisons of Income Poverty Based on a Capability Approach’. In Arguments for a Better World. Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, edited by Kaushik Basu and Ravi Kanbur, Volume I, pp. 7–29. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239979.003.0002 Reiss, Julian. 2013. Philosophy of Economics: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559062
Page 1 and 2:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9:
3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 10:
4.7 What about power and political
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements In 1998, when I st
Page 16 and 17:
Acknowledgements 5 the capability a
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction Many people who en
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction 9 capability approa
Page 22 and 23:
1. Introduction 11 Moreover, it bri
Page 24 and 25:
1. Introduction 13 Countries Outsi
Page 26 and 27:
1. Introduction 15 capabilities of
Page 28 and 29:
1. Introduction 17 their collaborat
Page 30 and 31:
1. Introduction 19 This book has a
Page 32 and 33:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework Th
Page 34 and 35:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework 23
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
90 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198: 186 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 247: 236 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 262 and 263: Index abortion 15, 145 advantage 25
Page 264 and 265: Index 253 Fleurbaey, Marc 154 flour
Page 266 and 267: Index 255 political institutions 14
Page 268: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?