06.09.2021 Views

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Clarifications<br />

145<br />

not very suitable for ethical issues that only concern questions about the right.<br />

For example, the capability approach is not a very helpful theory when<br />

analysing the morality of abortion since so much of that ethical debate<br />

is about issues of the right rather than about issues of the good. That is,<br />

most of the philosophical debates on the ethics of abortion concern the<br />

moral status of the foetus, notions of personhood, or questions about<br />

the autonomy <strong>and</strong> self-ownership of the pregnant woman — issues<br />

on which the capability approach remains mute. 18 It is therefore not<br />

surprising that the capability approach is more useful <strong>and</strong> more widely<br />

used as a theory analysing socio-economic policies where there is a<br />

consensus on those aspects that are questions about the right or where<br />

the questions about the right are much less weighty than those about the<br />

good. Examples include debates about poverty alleviation, distributive<br />

justice, environmental ethics <strong>and</strong> disability ethics. In sum, the capability<br />

approach is not a very helpful (or the most illuminating) framework for<br />

normative analyses in which elements regarding deontological duties<br />

<strong>and</strong> rights, which are not conceptually closely related to notions of<br />

wellbeing, play the most important role — that is, where aspects of the<br />

right are crucial in addressing the normative questions.<br />

<br />

in the capability approach<br />

In section 2.6.4 we discussed property A4, which stresses the importance<br />

of the difference between means <strong>and</strong> ends in the capabilities approach.<br />

In section 2.6.5, we discussed property A5, which claims that in the<br />

capability approach functionings <strong>and</strong> capabilities form the evaluative<br />

space. From these two core properties from module A, some may draw<br />

the conclusion that resources are no longer important in the capability<br />

approach. This is a mistake. <strong>Re</strong>sources are important, although in an<br />

instrumental manner.<br />

Firstly, a focus on functionings <strong>and</strong> capabilities does not necessarily<br />

imply that a capability analysis would not pay any attention to resources,<br />

18 Philosophical arguments on the moral permissibility of abortion come to widely<br />

divergent conclusions (e.g. Thomson 1971; Tooley 1972; English 1975; Marquis<br />

1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!