Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Clarifications<br />
145<br />
not very suitable for ethical issues that only concern questions about the right.<br />
For example, the capability approach is not a very helpful theory when<br />
analysing the morality of abortion since so much of that ethical debate<br />
is about issues of the right rather than about issues of the good. That is,<br />
most of the philosophical debates on the ethics of abortion concern the<br />
moral status of the foetus, notions of personhood, or questions about<br />
the autonomy <strong>and</strong> self-ownership of the pregnant woman — issues<br />
on which the capability approach remains mute. 18 It is therefore not<br />
surprising that the capability approach is more useful <strong>and</strong> more widely<br />
used as a theory analysing socio-economic policies where there is a<br />
consensus on those aspects that are questions about the right or where<br />
the questions about the right are much less weighty than those about the<br />
good. Examples include debates about poverty alleviation, distributive<br />
justice, environmental ethics <strong>and</strong> disability ethics. In sum, the capability<br />
approach is not a very helpful (or the most illuminating) framework for<br />
normative analyses in which elements regarding deontological duties<br />
<strong>and</strong> rights, which are not conceptually closely related to notions of<br />
wellbeing, play the most important role — that is, where aspects of the<br />
right are crucial in addressing the normative questions.<br />
<br />
in the capability approach<br />
In section 2.6.4 we discussed property A4, which stresses the importance<br />
of the difference between means <strong>and</strong> ends in the capabilities approach.<br />
In section 2.6.5, we discussed property A5, which claims that in the<br />
capability approach functionings <strong>and</strong> capabilities form the evaluative<br />
space. From these two core properties from module A, some may draw<br />
the conclusion that resources are no longer important in the capability<br />
approach. This is a mistake. <strong>Re</strong>sources are important, although in an<br />
instrumental manner.<br />
Firstly, a focus on functionings <strong>and</strong> capabilities does not necessarily<br />
imply that a capability analysis would not pay any attention to resources,<br />
18 Philosophical arguments on the moral permissibility of abortion come to widely<br />
divergent conclusions (e.g. Thomson 1971; Tooley 1972; English 1975; Marquis<br />
1989).