Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
96 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
often focuses on capabilities that are less necessary both for survival<br />
<strong>and</strong> the avoidance of poverty. It is important to acknowledge that<br />
the capability approach is not restricted to poverty <strong>and</strong> deprivation<br />
analysis but can also serve as a framework for, say, project or policy<br />
evaluations or inequality measurement in non-poor communities. Sen’s<br />
<strong>and</strong> Nussbaum’s extensive writings on the capability approach in the<br />
context of poverty alleviation <strong>and</strong> development questions have misled<br />
some of their readers into thinking that the capability approach is about<br />
poverty <strong>and</strong> development issues only. Yet as has been absolutely clear<br />
from the description <strong>and</strong> account of the capability approach presented<br />
in chapters 1 <strong>and</strong> 2, there is conceptually or normatively no reason to<br />
restrict its scope in this way. <strong>The</strong> term ‘basic capabilities’ is helpful since<br />
it can signal to the reader when the capability approach is specifically<br />
used in this context.<br />
<br />
Over the years, several proposals have been made to refine the notions<br />
of ‘functioning’ <strong>and</strong> ‘capability’, or to add additional qualifications<br />
which may be helpful in capability analyses.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first refinement — which is straightforward but still very<br />
helpful — is the distinction between general <strong>and</strong> specific functionings <strong>and</strong><br />
capabilities (Alkire 2002, 31). Suppose we are concerned with questions<br />
about what is needed for people not to be socially excluded. Sen has<br />
repeatedly referred to Adam Smith’s example that, in order to be able to<br />
appear in public without shame, one needed (in the time <strong>and</strong> place Smith<br />
lived) a linen shirt. Yet in other countries one would need a sari, or a suit,<br />
or something else. We all know that in every specific time <strong>and</strong> place,<br />
there are certain types of clothes one shouldn’t wear if one doesn’t want<br />
to be frowned upon or be seen as inappropriately dressed. We could<br />
say that, for women in place A, being able to wear a sari is important,<br />
<strong>and</strong> for men in another place, being able to wear a suit is important, in<br />
order not to be excluded. ‘Being able to wear a sari’ <strong>and</strong> ‘being able to<br />
wear a suit’ are specific capabilities; ‘being able to wear the clothes that<br />
are considered appropriate’ is the more general capability. Thus, if we<br />
formulate the relevant capabilities at a higher level of generality, it will<br />
be easier to reach agreement on what those are, than if we focus on more