Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
or measures ultimately must choose one principle or value that tells<br />
us something about the relative weight of the different dimensions. In<br />
Nussbaum’s work, they argue, there is also an implicit master-value,<br />
namely human dignity. It seems to me that this issue is not sufficiently<br />
analysed <strong>and</strong> the dispute not settled. One question one could raise<br />
is whether all master-values have the same function. It seems to be<br />
different whether the capabilities constitute the dimensions of a good life<br />
(as in the case of flourishing), or whether they contribute to the mastervalue.<br />
For the time being, we should in any case flag this as an issue to<br />
which more attention should be paid in the further development of our<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the capability approach.<br />
<br />
If in B1 one chooses an empirical study, one needs to know which<br />
methods to use. This is the task of the module C3. For example, the study<br />
could contain choices about which multivariate analysis tools to use or<br />
whether certain existing data sets are capturing functionings, capabilities,<br />
or merely rough indicators. In C3, we also make methodological choices<br />
related to empirical analysis: does a particular capability issue require<br />
quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, or a combination? In part, the<br />
contours of the empirical analysis will be influenced by one’s ambitions<br />
<strong>and</strong> goals: is one trying to measure functionings <strong>and</strong>/or capabilities<br />
directly, or is one measuring resources <strong>and</strong> conversion factors in order<br />
to infer the capability set?<br />
For empirical capability applications, these are of course huge<br />
methodological questions that need to be answered. <strong>The</strong>se empirical<br />
methods questions may be particularly challenging for the capability<br />
approach for two reasons. First, because it is a radically multidimensional<br />
approach, <strong>and</strong> multidimensional analysis is by its very nature more<br />
complicated than a one-dimensional analysis. Second, in many cases, the<br />
relevant dimensions will include dimensions on which the collection of<br />
data is difficult, or on which no data are available — such as the quality<br />
of our social networks, the degree to which we do not suffer from<br />
excessive levels of stress, or our mental health. Nevertheless, as Alkire