06.09.2021 Views

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />

or to the evaluation of social institutions, economic growth, technical<br />

advancement, <strong>and</strong> so forth. While functionings <strong>and</strong> capabilities are of<br />

ultimate concern, other dimensions can be important as well, but in<br />

an instrumental way, or as indicators for what ultimately matters. For<br />

example, in their evaluation of development in India, Drèze <strong>and</strong> Sen<br />

have stressed that working within the capability approach in no way<br />

excludes the integration of an analysis of resources:<br />

It should be clear that we have tended to judge development by the<br />

expansion of substantive human freedoms — not just by economic<br />

growth (for example, of the gross national product), or technical progress,<br />

or social modernization. This is not to deny, in any way, that advances in<br />

the latter fields can be very important, depending on circumstances, as<br />

‘instruments’ for the enhancement of human freedom. But they have to<br />

be appraised precisely in that light — in terms of their actual effectiveness<br />

in enriching the lives <strong>and</strong> liberties of people — rather than taking them<br />

to be valuable in themselves. (Drèze <strong>and</strong> Sen 2002, 3)<br />

Second, once we have decided which capabilities are relevant, we need<br />

to investigate the determinants of those capabilities — the factors which<br />

affect their emergence, size <strong>and</strong> robustness. As figure 2.1 illustrates,<br />

these determinants include resources, a person’s set of conversion<br />

factors <strong>and</strong> structural constraints. Hence if we want to exp<strong>and</strong> the<br />

capabilities of a person or a group, these are the levels at which we<br />

could intervene. <strong>Re</strong>sources are not the only things that matter, <strong>and</strong> for<br />

some capabilities that we try to exp<strong>and</strong> or try to equalise, resources<br />

may not be the most effective factor of intervention. At the same time,<br />

it is also clear that resources are very important for most capabilities<br />

<strong>and</strong> there are hardly any capabilities where resources play no role at<br />

all. Being able to buy presents enhances the capability of affiliation <strong>and</strong><br />

social interaction; being able to get the best medical care enhances the<br />

capability of health; <strong>and</strong> being able to afford time off <strong>and</strong> time to travel<br />

enhances the capability to enjoy nature. Hence even those capabilities<br />

that could be seen as non-material dimensions of advantage are<br />

nevertheless also aided by the availability of resources, albeit probably<br />

not in a linear way, <strong>and</strong> perhaps only up to a certain threshold level. If<br />

a capability analysis is aimed at making an intervention, then the exact<br />

relationship between resources <strong>and</strong> functionings needs to be studied<br />

for each capability analysis, rather than being assumed to have a<br />

certain shape.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!