Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 245 Sumner, Leonard Wayne. 1996. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238782.001.0001 Suzumura, Kotaro. 2016. Choice, Preferences, and Procedures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726307 Swift, Adam. 2008. ‘The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances’. Social Theory and Practice 34 (3), 363–87. https://doi.org/10.5840/ soctheorpract200834322 Taylor, Alan. 1979. ‘What’s Wrong with Negatlive Liberty?’ In The Idea of Freedom, edited by Alan Ryan, pp. 175–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Terzi, Lorella. 2005. ‘Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs’. Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3), 443–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00447.x Terzi, Lorella. 2007. ‘Capability and Educational Equality: The Just Distribution of Resources to Students with Disabilities and Special Educational Needs’. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (4), 757–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9752.2007.00589.x Terzi, Lorella. 2010. Justice and Equality in Education: A Capability Perspective on Disability and Special Educational Needs. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541178 Teschl, Miriam and Flavio Comim. 2005. ‘Adaptive Preferences and Capabilities: Some Preliminary Conceptual Explorations’. Review of Social Economy 63 (2), 229–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760500130374 Teschl, Miriam and Laurent Derobert. 2008. ‘Does Identity Matter? On the Relevance of Identity and Interaction for Capabilities’. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures, Applications, edited by Flavio Comim, Mozaffar Qizilbash and Sabina Alkire, pp. 125–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511492587.006 Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. ‘A Defense of Abortion’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (1), 47–66. Tooley, Michael. 1972. ‘Abortion and Infanticide’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2 (1), 37–65. Trommlerová, Sofia Karina, Stephan Klasen and Ortrud Leßmann. 2015. ‘Determinants of Empowerment in a Capability-Based Poverty Approach: Evidence from the Gambia’. World Development 66, 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.008 Tronto, Joan C. 1987. ‘Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12 (4), 644–63. https://doi. org/10.1086/494360 United Nations Development Program. 1990–2017. Human Development Reports. New York: UNDP.
246 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice Unterhalter, Elaine. 2003a. ‘Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries: The Potential of Sen’s Capability Approach for Sociologists of Education’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (5), 665–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0142569032000148708 Unterhalter, Elaine. 2003b. ‘The Capabilities Approach and Gendered Education An Examination of South African Complexities’. Theory and Research in Education 1 (1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001001660 Unterhalter, Elaine. 2009. ‘What Is Equity in Education? Reflections from the Capability Approach’. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (5), 415–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9125-7 Unterhalter, Elaine. 2013. ‘Educating Capabilities’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14 (1), 185–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.762183 Valentini, Laura. 2012. ‘Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map’. Philosophy Compass 7 (9), 654–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x Vallentyne, Peter. 2005. ‘Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Wellbeing’. Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (3), 359–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9760.2005.00227.x Vallentyne, Peter and Bas Van der Vossen. 2014. ‘Libertarianism’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism Van Parijs, Philippe. 1995. Real Freedom for All. What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/0198293577.001.0001 Van Praag, Bernard M. S. and Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell. 2004. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1093/0198286546.001.0001 Van Zanden, Jan Luiten, Joerg Baten, Marco Mira d’Ercole, Auke Rijpma, Conal Smith and Marcel Timmer. 2014. How Was Life? Global Wellbeing since 1820. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264214262-en Vaughan, Donna. 2011. ‘The Importance of Capabilities in the Sustainability of Information and Communications Technology Programs: The Case of Remote Indigenous Australian Communities’. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (2), 131–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9269-3 Veenhoven, Ruut. 1996. ‘Happy Life-Expectancy’. Social Indicators Research 39 (1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00300831 Venkatapuram, Sridhar. 2009. ‘A Bird’s Eye View. Two Topics at the Intersection of Social Determinants of Health and Social Justice Philosophy’. Public Health Ethics 2 (3), 224–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/php031 Venkatapuram, Sridhar. 2011. Health Justice. An Argument from the Capability Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Page 1 and 2:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 4 and 5:
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
Page 6 and 7:
Contents Acknowledgements 3 1. Intr
Page 8 and 9:
3. Clarifications 89 3.1 Introducti
Page 10:
4.7 What about power and political
Page 14 and 15:
Acknowledgements In 1998, when I st
Page 16 and 17:
Acknowledgements 5 the capability a
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction Many people who en
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction 9 capability approa
Page 22 and 23:
1. Introduction 11 Moreover, it bri
Page 24 and 25:
1. Introduction 13 Countries Outsi
Page 26 and 27:
1. Introduction 15 capabilities of
Page 28 and 29:
1. Introduction 17 their collaborat
Page 30 and 31:
1. Introduction 19 This book has a
Page 32 and 33:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework Th
Page 34 and 35:
2. Core Ideas and the Framework 23
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98:
Page 101 and 102:
90 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Ju
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206: 194 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 255: 244 Wellbeing, Freedom and Social J
Page 262 and 263: Index abortion 15, 145 advantage 25
Page 264 and 265: Index 253 Fleurbaey, Marc 154 flour
Page 266 and 267: Index 255 political institutions 14
Page 268: Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justi
show all

Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?