Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
116 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
that political self-determination (of an indigenous group) should be<br />
considered to be a collective capability which should be a central aim<br />
for development.<br />
What is shared in those cases, <strong>and</strong> what makes the idea of ‘collective<br />
capability’ plausible, is that a group or collective is needed to engage in<br />
collective action in order to reach the capability that the members of that<br />
group find valuable.<br />
Sen (2002b) points out that we should be careful not to confuse<br />
this with a capability that he calls “socially dependent individual<br />
capability” — a person’s capability, which that person enjoys, but<br />
for which the person is dependent on others to have that capability<br />
realised. Perhaps we should not use the term ‘individual capability’<br />
but rather ‘personal capability’, since for many defenders of ‘collective<br />
capabilities’ the word ‘individual’ evokes pejorative images of persons<br />
living by themselves on an isl<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re are no such human creatures;<br />
we all live interdependently, <strong>and</strong> none of us could grow up without<br />
prolonged care from others, or, as adults, have a decent chance of<br />
surviving <strong>and</strong> living a minimally adequate life. Human beings are, just<br />
as other mammals, animals who live in groups. Although philosophers<br />
are used to working with terms outside their everyday use, <strong>and</strong> most<br />
philosophers (especially those with an analytical background) will not<br />
have these pejorative connotations when they hear the term ‘individual<br />
capabilities’, I will proceed with the term ‘personal capabilities’ in order<br />
to facilitate the discussion in this section.<br />
Now, if we are very strict in our terminological distinctions, then<br />
collective capabilities are also personal capabilities, since it is individual<br />
persons who enjoy the capabilities that are thus secured. Still, there are<br />
two justifications to proceed with the term ‘collective capability’ — one<br />
fundamental one, <strong>and</strong> one additional one which is especially weighty<br />
from a practical point of view.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fundamental reason to keep <strong>and</strong> use the term ‘collective<br />
capability’ is that we may want to make a distinction between capabilities<br />
that are only realisable with the help of others, versus capabilities that<br />
require a group or collective to act in order to secure a capability for the<br />
members of that group. An example of the former would be learning a<br />
foreign language. It is impossible to do that without the help of others;<br />
one needs a teacher, or at the very least books <strong>and</strong> audio-tapes or<br />
internet lessons that help one with self-study. Still, that doesn’t suffice