Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
158 <strong>Wellbeing</strong>, <strong>Freedom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Justice</strong><br />
various specifications outlined above, while others may want to change<br />
the very nature of theorising about justice, moving it more to applied,<br />
non-ideal or grounded theories (Watene <strong>and</strong> Drydyk 2016).<br />
<br />
just practices <strong>and</strong> policies<br />
Before closing this section on capabilitarian theorizing about justice,<br />
let us briefly shift from theory to practice. Since theories of justice are<br />
mainly developed at a highly abstract level, often entailing ideals of<br />
perfect justice, we may wonder whether the capability approach to social<br />
justice <strong>and</strong> equality is of any use in telling us what justice-enhancing<br />
strategies <strong>and</strong> policies to develop. Indeed, this has sometimes been<br />
phrased as a serious concern, namely, that theories of justice are too<br />
abstract <strong>and</strong> do not help us with social justice struggles on the ground.<br />
One may well argue that we roughly know what is going wrong <strong>and</strong><br />
we need political action rather than more <strong>and</strong> more detailed theorising.<br />
Moreover, some think that in the real world the subtleties of theories<br />
of justice are easily abused in order to justify gross inequalities, as<br />
may have been the case with philosophical discussions on individual<br />
responsibility. For example, Brian Barry’s (2005) later work exemplified<br />
this concern with the direct application of theories of justice to political<br />
change <strong>and</strong> the reform of the welfare state, rather than with further<br />
philosophical refinements of theories of justice. <strong>Re</strong>lated charges have<br />
been aimed at the capability approach as well. For instance, it has<br />
been argued that not enough attention has been paid to issues of social<br />
power in the capability writings on justice, <strong>and</strong> Feldman <strong>and</strong> Gellert<br />
(2006) have underscored the importance of recognising the struggles<br />
<strong>and</strong> negotiations by dominated <strong>and</strong> disadvantaged groups if social<br />
justice is ever to be realised. Such questions of power politics, effective<br />
social criticism, successful collective action, historical <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />
sensitivities, <strong>and</strong> the negotiation of competing interests are indeed<br />
largely absent from the philosophical literature on theories of justice.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se ideal theories develop st<strong>and</strong>ards of a just society, but often do not<br />
tell us what institutions or policies are necessary if just societies are to be<br />
constructed, nor do they tell us what social <strong>and</strong> political processes will<br />
help advocates implement these social changes in concrete ways.