15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

used by everyone, whilst Attic was used by all Greek authors. He notes that Doric was used<br />

by Egyptians and in Syria, but does not explain further the remaining two, Aeolic and Ionic.<br />

His specific mention <strong>of</strong> Attic as a literary register suggests that the others are spoken<br />

registers. <strong>The</strong> final part <strong>of</strong> the passage refers clearly to spoken language, since Isidore is<br />

talking about sounds, suggesting that the Greeks and Asiani spoke from their palate (“in<br />

palato sermones feriunt”), whilst Syrian and Chalcedonian are close to Hebrew in their<br />

speech (“uicinus in Hebraeo est in sermone”), mentioning the sound <strong>of</strong> their letters (“sono<br />

litterarum”).<br />

It seems, then, that Isidore understood sermo to mean more generally the spoken<br />

language. This is important not only because it fits well with the idea <strong>of</strong> the monastic rules as<br />

being texts that were involved in oral recitation. It also suggests that the decision taken by<br />

Isidore to write sermone plebeio uel rustico, rather than in the altius uel obscurius style <strong>of</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> his predecessors, demonstrates a conscious step to dissociate from a one style <strong>of</strong><br />

writing and associate with another that was more reflective <strong>of</strong> the spoken language.<br />

5.8 Language Standard and Choice <strong>of</strong> Linguistic Register<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are various systems available to modern scholars to study the use <strong>of</strong> linguistic<br />

registers. One <strong>of</strong> the most useful is that posited by the Russian scholar Mikhail Bakhtin.<br />

Bakhtin‟s view <strong>of</strong> language and literature was, in many ways, similar to those <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Formalist school (Dentith 1995: 22-40). Bakhtin proposed that language was „dialogic‟,<br />

meaning that all language use was contextual and addressed to an audience (even if that<br />

audience were the speaker himself). However, language is in reality an amalgamation <strong>of</strong><br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!