15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

trend within Indo-European languages, possibly due to underlying socio-historical factors;<br />

second, that deponent verbs disappeared as a result <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> analogy. It is important not to<br />

treat the loss <strong>of</strong> synthetic elements in Romance in isolation. Many modern Indo-European<br />

languages contain predominantly analytic grammatical features, despite the fact that some <strong>of</strong><br />

them are descended from languages that were once largely synthetic: “[proto-Indo-European]<br />

had a relatively complicated morphological structure. <strong>The</strong> most commonly found change is<br />

therefore that <strong>of</strong> the disappearance <strong>of</strong> morphological categories” (Beekes 1995: 90). This is<br />

a situation that merits further exploration. An interesting comparison is that <strong>of</strong> Latin /<br />

Romance with Old English / Middle English, where the English language seemed to have lost<br />

many <strong>of</strong> its synthetic elements and changed more in the few centuries between, for example,<br />

the Beowulf epic and Chaucer in the fourteenth century than it has in the almost six-hundred<br />

or so years that separate the latter from today.<br />

This is a perplexing situation, and one that has been approached by various scholars.<br />

Clark (1957: 110-116; also Van Gelderen 2006: 91-154) devoted considerable space to the<br />

problem. For him, the answer lies in the fact that Old English is a literary language, not<br />

necessarily reflective <strong>of</strong> the much more analytic speech. <strong>The</strong> Norman Conquest and<br />

subsequent domination <strong>of</strong> Anglo-Norman meant that English was no-longer used as a literary<br />

language and so its development was not restrained by a written standard. When it came to<br />

be used again by writers such as Chaucer, the written language was now based on spoken<br />

norms, rather than that <strong>of</strong> an older standard. <strong>The</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> a language quite changed<br />

from Old English was therefore a direct result <strong>of</strong> 1066 and the subsequent disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />

an archaic and codified literary form. Interestingly, Pulgram (1975) proposed that the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> an external language, in this case Greek, could have contributed to a literary<br />

language further removed from spoken speech: “I venture to suggest that the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!