15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Any observation on the theme <strong>of</strong> defining a textual genre must necessarily recognise<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> genre itself to be fluid, whose reception is entirely dependent upon audience<br />

reception and context (Frow 2006: 1-5). As such, only rarely is it possible to speak <strong>of</strong> fixed<br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> a genre (Fowler 1979 and 2002; Miller 1994). In addition, these boundaries<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten fixed no more by ancient constraints than by modern ones: “if genres are confined<br />

to the classes <strong>of</strong> texts that have been historically perceived as such, their classification is<br />

inevitably bound to the ideology <strong>of</strong> a society that chooses to encode only certain forms as<br />

genres […] genre is thus the site <strong>of</strong> a constant renegotiation between fixed canons and<br />

historical pressures, systems and individuals” (Rajan & Wright 1998: 1). This is even more<br />

so the case for Christian literature, which “saw different forms used as vehicles for a single<br />

given tradition <strong>of</strong> Christian argument” (Young 2004b: 254). Nevertheless, the key to a genre<br />

is convention and so it is only right to look for textual aspects <strong>of</strong> the monastic rules that both<br />

set them apart from other works, as well as homogenise them to some extent with each other.<br />

It is from this point <strong>of</strong> view that the study begins: “the study <strong>of</strong> genre has to be founded on<br />

the study <strong>of</strong> convention” (Frye 1957: 96).<br />

<strong>The</strong> most prominent figure in monastic studies <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, de Vogüé, has<br />

to date been the most vociferous scholar in defining a monastic rule (1977; also useful are his<br />

1985 and 1989). De Vogüé proposed a literary schema constituting eight generations <strong>of</strong> texts<br />

that he classed as monastic rules, beginning with what he termed the „mother rules‟ <strong>of</strong><br />

Pachomius, Basil and Augustine. <strong>The</strong> subsequent generations were organised<br />

chronologically and end with the eighth generation in the seventh century, comprising the<br />

Rule <strong>of</strong> Fructuosus, the Rule <strong>of</strong> Donatus and the Rule <strong>of</strong> Waldebert. Elsewhere, he further<br />

distinguished that “les règles peuvent se répartir approximativement en trois groupes, suivant<br />

quelles donnent la priorité à la vie commune, à la consecratión personelle ou à l‟obéissance”<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!