15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

languages are those in which “auxiliary words are the chief or sole means <strong>of</strong> expressing<br />

grammatical relationships <strong>of</strong> words, to the total or partial elimination <strong>of</strong> inflection”, synthetic<br />

languages are those in which the “grammatical relationships <strong>of</strong> words are expressed<br />

principally by means <strong>of</strong> inflections” (Pei & Gaynor 1954: 212). <strong>The</strong> heavily analytic nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> Latin, as opposed to the preponderance towards analysis in Romance, has been long<br />

observed; one scholar summed up, in a description <strong>of</strong> Latin and its vernacular descendents in<br />

later periods: “Medieval Latin was a synthetic language in an analytic world” (Rigg 1996:<br />

89).<br />

It is in verbal morphology where the shift from synthesis to analysis is best<br />

documented. This is especially the case outside the simple present, preterit and future, which<br />

have remained synthetic in Romance. Deponent verbs were subject to two processes,<br />

although in each case they disappeared from use. In some cases, their use was replaced<br />

instead with a normal active synonym. For example: Lat. osculor > basiare > Sp. besar, Ptg.<br />

beijar; Lat. uescor > comedere > Sp., Ptg. comer. In other cases, deponent verbs were<br />

levelled through analogy with normal active forms. For example: Lat. sequor > Sp., Ptg.<br />

seguir; Lat. fabulor > Sp. hablar, Ptg. falar.<br />

<strong>The</strong> passive voice, in contrast, has been retained in Romance, although the Latin<br />

synthetic passive has not survived in any Romance language. 557 Instead, it was replaced with<br />

557 Interestingly, linguists have not yet been able to reconstruct a passive voice in Proto-Indo-<br />

European. Presumably, some method <strong>of</strong> constructing a passive voice did exist, but it is possible that it<br />

was formed using particles rather than a verbal conjugation. Lehmann (1993: 184-45) posits a<br />

comparison with Quechua, which also uses particles to mark the passive voice, rather than a verbal<br />

conjugation.<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!