15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Palladius: “mela rotunda, quae orbiculata dicuntur, sine cura toto anno seruare se<br />

possunt‖, 567 and Ambrosiaster: “natura enim de ipsa se nouit”. 568 <strong>The</strong>refore, the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

the why and when deponent and synthetic passive forms might have disappeared is not as<br />

clear-cut as it may at first appear, and it is not sufficient to merely posit a terminus ante quem<br />

for their disappearance in the first Romance writings.<br />

Whilst there has been a ubiquitous acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> these paradigms, it has been<br />

coupled with a paucity <strong>of</strong> investigation. This is especially true concerning the question <strong>of</strong><br />

why or when such forms disappeared from the spoken language, a problem that is particularly<br />

prominent in works on historical Romance linguistics, which rarely include discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

topic; the reason for this is presumably that since they are not a feature <strong>of</strong> Romance, there is<br />

supposedly little need for their investigation. This is evident following a quick review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> textbooks on the subject. 569 Studies on Latin linguistics, meanwhile, tend to list<br />

the linguistic features in later texts that make them different from Classical Latin. Such an<br />

approach has typically been the mainstay <strong>of</strong> the two different camps, satisfying both<br />

Romance linguists who seek out nascent features <strong>of</strong> the vernacular languages, and Latinists in<br />

their hunt for features that differentiate the language from its classical predecessor. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

two separate approaches have fostered the idea <strong>of</strong> a linguistic no-man‟s land for the period,<br />

marking it out as the responsibility <strong>of</strong> neither. As Wright (1993: 77) stated, “the<br />

567 De Re Rustica 3.25.18.<br />

568 Quaestiones Ueteris et Noui Testamenti 125.9.<br />

569 For example, Poulter (1990: 52) states simply that “inflection for the passive voice disappeared”;<br />

Rickard (1974: 13) notes that “[in Vulgar Latin] the synthetic passives are badly known and<br />

comparatively little used”; Lathrop (1980) ignores the subject altogether, and Mattoso Camara (1972)<br />

sidelines the subject with little discussion. <strong>The</strong>se are just four examples, but represent an overall<br />

general pattern.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!