15.02.2013 Views

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

The Monastic Rules of Visigothic Iberia - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

early medieval spoken language <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, not only for understanding how a<br />

change from Latin to Romance might have occurred, but more importantly also for<br />

understanding how texts were used in such a context. <strong>The</strong> Wright thesis has been widely<br />

lauded in Anglophone scholarship, although this is not to say that it is without criticism<br />

(Quilis Merín 1999: 169-228). Modern literature shows the danger that some scholars have<br />

come to accept the Wright thesis as fact, as though the problems <strong>of</strong> language in the early<br />

Middle Ages were now a virtual closed book. 556<br />

Wright‟s basic thesis is that in pre-Carolingian communities there existed no conceptual<br />

distinction between Latin and Romance and that everyone spoke a regionalised dialect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vernacular; those who had access to education learnt how to write in an <strong>of</strong>ten archaic way,<br />

not necessarily reflective <strong>of</strong> their speech habits, for example with the use <strong>of</strong> inflectional<br />

morphology and pre-defined spellings. However, when a text was read, potentially archaic or<br />

disappeared forms, which were no longer current in the spoken language, were glossed into<br />

appropriate forms. Since only those who were educated sufficiently were able to read, they<br />

would have been educated sufficiently to be able to gloss the forms.<br />

556 Thus Smith (2005: 24) notes that “regional divergences in the spoken lingua romana gradually<br />

became even stronger in Antiquity, and pronunciation changed too, but not so much as to cause<br />

incomprehension between speakers from different regions. That started to happen only around 1200”.<br />

Presumably, the author was making reference to Wright‟s dates <strong>of</strong> the Lateran Council <strong>of</strong> 1215 and<br />

the Council <strong>of</strong> Valladolid in 1228, to which he places the beginning <strong>of</strong> the Latin and Romance<br />

distinction. Since Wright is not even referenced in the section, there is a suggestion that Wright‟s<br />

theory has been presumed to be fact. Lόpez-Morillas (2000) discusses the history <strong>of</strong> Latin in the<br />

<strong>Iberia</strong>n Peninsula prior to the Arab invasions and bases the entire article on the Wright thesis, without<br />

reference to its problems. Lloyd (1984: 377) in an early review <strong>of</strong> Wright‟s work, wrote: “it all seems<br />

so clear and obvious now, as Wright has explained it, that I can only wonder why anyone ever thought<br />

any differently”.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!