28.01.2013 Views

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

they would also suffer heavy casualties together, decimating whole<br />

sections of a community. As a result of the Somme, grief was<br />

widespread in hundreds of communities across the UK.<br />

Not surprisingly, the battle, the tactics employed, and the leadership of<br />

the Army remain a controversial subject with professional historians,<br />

who these days tend increasingly to defend the generalship of the Army,<br />

pitted against the widespread belief, reinforced by many family<br />

historians, that the men were callously thrown against the German<br />

trenches in a pointless and ill-conceived battle. Apart from the historical<br />

facts that have made the story of this battle so enduring, much of the<br />

reason why the battle, and particularly the opening 24 hours, has<br />

remained in the public conscience is because it was recorded on film.<br />

Material for Battle of the Somme was the work of just two<br />

cameramen. Geoffrey Malins, one of the first official cinematographers<br />

sent to France, filmed the opening of the offensive from positions near<br />

Beaumont Hamel, in the northern part of the battlefield. The second<br />

cameraman, J.B. McDowell, a more recent arrival, was based further<br />

south, near Fricourt and Mametz.<br />

Filming a major battle in 1916 was difficult. Not only was it obviously<br />

impossible for two cameramen to cover some 16 miles of front, but the<br />

capabilities of the cameras, lenses, and film stock available at the time<br />

made it difficult to film in certain conditions – for example, in poor light<br />

or at great distance. It was almost certainly the unsatisfactory nature of<br />

the footage actually filmed at the start of the Battle of the Somme on<br />

1 July 1916 that led to the inclusion of a staged “over the top” scene in<br />

the final completed film. Nonetheless, cinema audiences in 1916/17<br />

believed that films were giving them an unprecedented opportunity to<br />

see and share the experiences of soldiers fighting on the Western Front.<br />

This belief – endorsed by Secretary of State for War David Lloyd George<br />

in a statement read to the audience at the first screening on 10 August<br />

1916 – made the film hugely popular. It has been calculated that 20<br />

million cinema admissions to Battle of the Somme were sold in the<br />

first 6 weeks of its release. (The population of Britain at this time was<br />

some 43 million.)<br />

The same belief took hold in the press.The amount of coverage which<br />

Battle of the Somme attracted is itself remarkable, given that there<br />

was as yet no tradition of film reviewing in the general press, and the<br />

emphasis on reality is striking.The trade journal <strong>Cinema</strong> News wrote:<br />

“There is no make-believe. This is the real thing. This is war, rich with<br />

death.”The Manchester Guardian spoke of “the real thing at last”; the<br />

Daily Express said, “For sheer realism there has perhaps never been<br />

anything to excel this wonderful film”; and the Daily Sketch claimed,“it<br />

is war, grim, red war; the real thing.” Taking a longer perspective, The<br />

Times wrote, “In years to come, when historians want to know the<br />

conditions under which the great offensive was launched, they will only<br />

have to send for these films and a complete idea of the situation will be<br />

revealed before their eyes, for we take it as a matter of course that a<br />

number of copies of them will be carefully preserved in the national<br />

archives.”<br />

The possibility of a more awful form of reality – that people might<br />

22<br />

recognize loved ones among the wounded and dead, or see someone fit<br />

and healthy on the screen whom they knew to have been killed<br />

subsequently – was also a concern.A debate in The Times was initiated<br />

when the Dean of Durham wrote a letter about the film on 1<br />

September 1916, saying, “I beg leave respectfully to enter a protest<br />

against an entertainment which wounds the heart and violates the very<br />

sanctities of bereavement.” Most of those who responded disagreed,<br />

arguing that the film gave the bereaved some idea of what their loved<br />

ones had experienced, and would help strengthen the bond between<br />

Flanders and the home front.<br />

It is a credit to the skill, bravery, and sincerity of purpose of Malins and<br />

McDowell that images from the film have proved so useful to<br />

succeeding generations of film and television producers who wanted to<br />

quickly, powerfully, and realistically convey the nature of trench warfare<br />

on the Western Front. In fact, the footage is so effective that it is<br />

generally used to illustrate not just this battle, but to evoke the nature<br />

of trench warfare at any stage during the First World War, and often to<br />

symbolize the drama and agony of war itself. Sequences from the film,<br />

usually unacknowledged, have been used in countless documentaries,<br />

propaganda films, and dramas. As a result, a handful of sequences, such<br />

as the explosion of a British mine under the German positions at<br />

Beaumont Hamel, the “over the top attack”, the trench rescue scene,<br />

and the “field of dead”, are so familiar and ubiquitous that they could<br />

be described as iconic, or even clichéd.<br />

For all these reasons – the value of the film as a record of the events it<br />

portrays, its role in giving contemporary audiences the sense they were<br />

sharing the “reality” of those events, its influence on the development of<br />

documentary and propaganda coverage of conflict, and its continuing<br />

role in shaping the image of the First World War for succeeding<br />

generations – the Imperial War Museum nominated Battle of the<br />

Somme for inclusion in UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” register, and<br />

the film was formally inscribed in 2005.<br />

Despite the familiarity of the scenes in Battle of the Somme, few have<br />

had the opportunity to see the complete film, still less to have seen it in<br />

the way it would have been experienced by its first audiences: projected<br />

on a large screen, at the correct speed, and with a live musical<br />

accompaniment. Although the IWM has endeavoured to recreate these<br />

conditions with occasional musical screenings in its cinema, and by<br />

selling a video version with an improvised piano accompaniment (by<br />

Andrew You<strong>del</strong>l), until recently it was hard for us to imagine how cinema<br />

musicians would have interpreted the film for an audience in 1916.<br />

However, in 1999, in The Bioscope, the British cinema industry’s trade<br />

paper, we finally came across a list of musical recommendations to be<br />

played to the film. In August 1916, William Jury, a commercial film<br />

producer who had been appointed by the government to distribute<br />

Battle of the Somme, asked cinema musician J. Morton Hutcheson to<br />

select suitable music to accompany screenings of the film.The medley<br />

Hutcheson suggested was published in The Bioscope on 17 August<br />

1916, three days before the film went on general release. The IWM<br />

decided to reconstruct this medley for a screening in Belfast on 1 July

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!