28.01.2013 Views

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Ugly Duckling.<br />

(Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc.)<br />

dazzling aerial scene where the camera seems to dive through the air to<br />

assault a predatory chicken hawk.This was an effect made possible by a<br />

special mount designed for the studio’s new Universal camera, which<br />

enabled the filmmakers to raise, lower, and rotate their camera a full<br />

360°.Animation aside, Birds of a Feather also prefigures a classic Disney<br />

formula that would be endlessly recycled in the early days of the New<br />

Deal: organizing a comic folk army made up of small fry to repel a<br />

powerful bully.<br />

Eisenstein likely saw Birds of a Feather in London, where it played with<br />

Chaplin’s City Lights at the Dominion Theatre for the better part of 3<br />

months.Thereafter, Chaplin asked that a Disney cartoon be shown with<br />

City Lights whenever possible. – RUSSELL MERRITT<br />

THE UGLY DUCKLING (L’anitroccolo eroico) (Walt Disney<br />

Productions, US 1931)<br />

Prod: Walt Disney; regia/dir: Wilfred Jackson; mus: Frank Churchill?<br />

Bert <strong>Le</strong>wis?; anim: Dick Lundy, Rudy Zamora, <strong>Le</strong>s Clark, et al.; 35mm,<br />

618 ft., 6’52” (24 fps), sonoro/sound,Walt Disney Co.<br />

Nel 1931, dopo due anni di Sinfonie a base di comici inseguimenti<br />

e balli in libertà, Disney fece il salto nella narrativa, concludendo<br />

quest’anno straordinario con un libero adattamento <strong>del</strong>la fiaba di<br />

Hans Christian Andersen “Il brutto anatroccolo”. Il cartoon<br />

propone tra l’altro un <strong>del</strong>izioso omaggio a Way Down East (Agonia<br />

sui ghiacci) quando la madre e i fratelli <strong>del</strong>l’anatroccolo vengono<br />

risucchiati da una tromba d’aria e trascinati verso un’enorme<br />

cascata. Ma ciò che veramente conta è la sottigliezza psicologica<br />

39<br />

con cui viene tratteggiato l’anatroccolo. Finora Disney aveva<br />

puntato sulle paure infantili puramente fisiche: paura di cadere, di<br />

essere bruciati, di essere mangiati, di avere freddo, di annegare. Con<br />

The Ugly Duckling, egli comincia a scavare più a fondo prendendo in<br />

considerazione le paure psicologiche <strong>del</strong> bambino – il terrore di<br />

essere abbandonato, il disprezzo di sé – e gli altri problemi <strong>del</strong><br />

crescere. – RUSSELL MERRITT<br />

In 1931, after 2 years of free-form comic dance and chase Symphonies,<br />

Disney took the leap into narrative, ending this extraordinary year with<br />

his free adaptation of the Hans Christian Andersen children’s story. The<br />

Ugly Duckling contains, among other things, a charming hommage to<br />

Way Down East, as the Duckling’s mother and siblings are swept up in<br />

a storm and hurled towards a large waterfall. But its real importance is<br />

the psychological nuance Disney gives his Duckling. Up to this point,<br />

Disney had limited himself to exploiting purely physical fears of<br />

childhood: fears of falling, burning, being eaten, freezing, and drowning.<br />

With The Ugly Duckling, he starts to dig deeper, looking at the<br />

psychological terrors of childhood – abandonment, self-loathing – and<br />

the other costs of growing up. – RUSSELL MERRITT<br />

FLOWERS AND TREES (Walt Disney Productions, US 1932)<br />

Prod: Walt Disney; regia/dir: Burt Gillett; mus: Bert <strong>Le</strong>wis? Frank<br />

Churchill?; anim: Dave Hand,Tom Palmer, Norm Ferguson, et al.; 35mm,<br />

703 ft., 7’49” (24 fps),Technicolor, sonoro/sound,Walt Disney Co.<br />

Nel mondo <strong>del</strong>l’animazione tutto è possibile, anche che l’amore<br />

sbocci fra due giovani alberi. Originariamente prodotto in bianco e<br />

nero, Flowers and Trees venne rifatto a colori ed è oggi noto come il<br />

primo disegno animato realizzato in Technicolor tripack. Ci sono<br />

anche altri motivi d’interesse, fra cui l’apprendistato come animatori<br />

di Fred Moore e Ham Luske (che in pochi brevi anni diventarono<br />

due dei più importanti artisti <strong>del</strong>lo studio) e una colonna sonora<br />

costituita interamente da brani classici. Nel 1932 comunque fu la<br />

ricchezza cromatica a far colpo ovunque il film fosse presentato. E<br />

fu soprattutto per questa innovazione tecnica che Flowers and Trees<br />

vinse l’Oscar come miglior cartoon. – J.B. KAUFMAN<br />

In the world of animation anything is possible, including a budding<br />

romance between two young trees. Although originally produced in black<br />

and white, Flowers and Trees was remade in color and today is famous<br />

as the first animated cartoon produced in three-strip Technicolor. It has<br />

other features of interest too, including apprentice animation by Fred<br />

Moore and Ham Luske (who would become two of the studio’s most<br />

important artists within a few short years), and a musical score<br />

assembled entirely from classical themes. In 1932, however, it was the<br />

rich color that created a sensation wherever the film was shown.Thanks<br />

largely to this innovation, Flowers and Trees won the first Academy<br />

Award in the category of Best Cartoon. – J.B. KAUFMAN<br />

EVENTI SPECIALI<br />

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!