28.01.2013 Views

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

Le Giornate del Cinema Muto 2006 Sommario / Contents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

affirm, that Genina is an author whose work is readable from its conclusion<br />

(the great final films, or even some unrealized projects), which does not<br />

signify however that pearls are not to be found in all phases of his career.<br />

Genina’s cinema is different from that of his cousin Mario Camerini, whose<br />

beauty is already intact in his debut (as revealed in Kif tebbi [1928], and<br />

as would probably be confirmed by his lost first film, Jolly [1923], produced<br />

by Genina).<br />

Genina is an author at whose origins is a very powerful image, which does<br />

not belong to cinema, but to reality: the scene, witnessed in his childhood, of<br />

a child suddenly caught and destroyed in a blaze, a scene which marked his<br />

cinema, obsessed with catastrophes, and which ever increasingly became a<br />

challenge to death, from the sequence of the execution (a true overturned<br />

cosmogony) and that of the explosion of the fortress in L’Assedio<br />

<strong>del</strong>l’Alcazar (1940) to the confrontation of the negative (the sterility of the<br />

marshes, love as violence) of Cielo sulla palude (1949) to the re-evocation<br />

of the childhood trauma in Maddalena (1954), and to that great<br />

comprehensive film, Tre storie proibite (Three Forbidden Stories, 1952).<br />

Genina’s cinema lives the irruptions of reality – or more precisely, what<br />

appears one of the indispensable points of his cinema, is that it feels the<br />

force of reality and the burden of death upon it (only Rossellini, Dreyer,<br />

Rossen, and Minnelli feel the relationship with reality with the same force).<br />

Among the irruptions of reality in his work, that of sound – or, to be precise,<br />

of the voice – is fundamental. La voce umana is also the title of a 1948<br />

work by Rossellini (inspired by Cocteau). Like Rossellini (and with traits of<br />

Cottafavi), he weaves into Italian cinema secret correspondences, based<br />

principally on feminine fascination. It is just to admire the rediscovered silent<br />

version of Prix de Beauté, the beauty of its images not amputated by the<br />

space of the soundtrack, and the theoretical linearity of a corpus of film in<br />

which at the end the voice intrudes. But this version is not going to be<br />

admired differently from how much we may admire, if found, the version<br />

with the original working track of Fellini’s La dolce vita, that is something<br />

more explicit (for Fellini in the babel of tongues and sounds, for Genina, in<br />

the irruption of the voice in a silent universe), but in respect of which the<br />

directors’ subsequent interventions have complicated the fascination.<br />

The spurious character of the sound version of Prix de Beauté – or, to be<br />

more precise, of one of its four sound versions, in this case the French, which<br />

is the only one that has survived, and which is moreover one of the two in<br />

which Louise Brooks is dubbed – does not detract from the beauty of the<br />

film, but rather connects and elaborates it.“Once I heard the voice” – to use<br />

the words of the director, which was after having conceived and directed his<br />

finale – Genina felt the need to unite all the images of the film with the<br />

broadest variety of possible sounds, from the realistic to the abstract in an<br />

avant-garde style, from direct, live sound (anticipating Renoir and Vigo) to<br />

the manipulation of dubbing. In the body of this sound version are<br />

concealed, as in the most fascinating works of Genina, the secrets of the<br />

relationship between the human presence and images.<br />

The cinema of Genina tends to something further: to a passion beyond<br />

death, like that experienced by the protagonists of his last films. The<br />

paradise of which these protagonists dream does not belong to any religious<br />

confession, but only to the fragile utopia of the cinematographic image.The<br />

36<br />

moment in which this paradise introduces itself into the image and the<br />

finale of Prix de Beauté is that of the manifestation of a voice no less<br />

surprising than that which was heard by Joan of Arc. Because Prix de<br />

Beauté certainly appears miraculous: the insuperable fascination of Brooks,<br />

discovered by Pabst and here immersed in a great invention of Clair, finds<br />

precisely in the stupefying direction of Genina its own nature, that of a<br />

crucial masterpiece of the history of cinema. – SERGIO GRMEK GERMANI<br />

LOUISE BROOKS: LOOKING FOR LULU (Timeline Films, US<br />

1998)<br />

Regia/dir., mo./ed: Hugh Munro Neely; prod. esec./exec. prod. (Turner<br />

Classic Movies): Hugh M. Hefner, Carl H. Lindahl; prod: Elaina B.Archer,<br />

Hugh Munro Neely; scen: Barry Paris; f./ph: John C. Lucker II; mus:<br />

Nigel Holton; interv: Louise Brooks, Margareth Brooks, Roseanne<br />

Brooks, David Diamond,Adolph Green, Bill Klein, Jane Sherman <strong>Le</strong>hac,<br />

Kaye MacRae, Francis <strong>Le</strong>derer, John Springer, Roddy McDowall, Dana<br />

Delany, Paolo Cherchi Usai; narr: Shirley MacLaine; DVD, 60’,<br />

sonoro/sound, Timeline Films, Culver City, CA. Produced in association<br />

with Turner Classic Movies.<br />

Versione inglese / English dialogue and narration.<br />

“Questo ritratto di Lulu/Louise Brooks, sceneggiato dal suo massimo<br />

biografo, Barry Paris, riesamina la sua leggenda” (così Lorenzo Co<strong>del</strong>li<br />

nel catalogo <strong>del</strong>le <strong>Giornate</strong> 1998). Il documentario viene ora<br />

ripresentato in occasione <strong>del</strong> centenario <strong>del</strong>l’attrice. Combinando<br />

brillantemente citazioni dai film, dal primo The Street of Forgotten Men<br />

(1925), all’ultimo Overland Stage Raiders (1938), passando attraverso<br />

It’s the Old Army Game (1926), The Show Off (1926), Love ’Em and <strong>Le</strong>ave<br />

’Em (1927), Beggars of Life (1928), Die Büchse der Pandora (1929), Prix<br />

de beauté (1930) e The Canary Murder Case (1929), con approfondite<br />

interviste a testimoni e a storici e con materiale iconografico di<br />

grande suggestione, Looking for Lulu continua ad essere affascinante<br />

come il suo soggetto. Fra le assolute rarità, un’intervista con la Brooks<br />

settantenne filmata a Rochester nel 1976. Uscito in Inghilterra come<br />

extra <strong>del</strong> DVD Pandora’s Box special edition. – LIVIO JACOB<br />

“This portrait of Lulu/Louise Brooks, written by her definitive biographer,<br />

Barry Paris, re-examines the legend,” wrote Lorenzo Co<strong>del</strong>li in the<br />

catalogue of the 1989 <strong>Giornate</strong> <strong>del</strong> <strong>Cinema</strong> <strong>Muto</strong>. The <strong>Giornate</strong> now<br />

revives the documentary to mark the centenary of the actress’s birth.<br />

Brilliantly juxtaposing extracts from her films – from her debut in The<br />

Street of Forgotten Men (1925) to her last appearance, in Overland<br />

Stage Raiders (1938), taking in It’s the Old Army Game (1926), The<br />

Show Off (1926), Love ’Em and <strong>Le</strong>ave ’Em (1927), Beggars of Life<br />

(1928), Die Büchse der Pandora (1929), Prix de Beauté (1930), and<br />

The Canary Murder Case (1929) – along with in-depth interviews with<br />

witnesses and historians, and richly evocative iconographic materials,<br />

Looking for Lulu remains as fascinating as its subject. Among the most<br />

precious documents is an interview with Brooks at 70, filmed in<br />

Rochester in 1976.The film was issued in Britain as an extra on the DVD<br />

special edition of Pandora’s Box. – LIVIO JACOB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!