02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

critical studies 2000 137<br />

earlier history book, Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian. Part I is a chronological<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> major sources during several different periods: Persian, early Greek,<br />

later Greek (including Hasmonean), Roman, <strong>and</strong> Yavneh. Here <strong>Philo</strong> is discussed<br />

briefly (pp. 89–92) in the chapter ‘Under Roman rule (63B.C.E.–70C.E.)’.<br />

Part II covers special topics, including temple <strong>and</strong> priesthood; Scripture, prayer,<br />

<strong>and</strong> synagogue; sects <strong>and</strong> movements; concepts <strong>of</strong> the Deity <strong>and</strong> spirit world;<br />

prophecy, apocalypticism, the esoteric arts, <strong>and</strong> predicting the future; eschatologies<br />

<strong>and</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> salvation; messiahs; <strong>and</strong> Jews <strong>and</strong> Judaism in the Hellenistic<br />

world. <strong>Philo</strong> is mentioned here in scattered places, but especially in the chapters<br />

on concepts <strong>of</strong> the Deity <strong>and</strong> on messiahs. Part III by way <strong>of</strong> conclusion provides<br />

a holistic perspective on Judaism in the Second Temple period. Bibliographies<br />

are provided throughout. Reviews: L. H. Feldman, SPhA 14 (2002) 206–216.<br />

(EB)<br />

20027. V.Guignard,‘Lerapportd’Israelàl’histoiredansl’œuvre<br />

de <strong>Philo</strong>n d’Alex<strong>and</strong>rie,’ in L.-J. Bord <strong>and</strong> D. Hamidovic (edd.), De<br />

Jérusalem à Rome: Mélanges <strong>of</strong>ferts à Jean Riaud par ses amis, ses collègues<br />

et ses anciens élèves (Paris 2000) 175–194.<br />

<strong>Philo</strong>’s view <strong>of</strong> history is fundamentally sceptical. This is the reason that<br />

messianism represents no more than a marginal part <strong>of</strong> his preoccupations.<br />

Apart from Divine providence, to which he attaches great importance, he looks<br />

above all to Rome when evoking the security <strong>and</strong> earthly prosperity <strong>of</strong> the Jews.<br />

The particular concern that Providence shows towards Israel testifies to her<br />

election. A sign <strong>of</strong> this election is the observance <strong>of</strong> the Law. This gives Israel<br />

a separate state in history, because she is not subject to its ‘cyclical revolutions’.<br />

(JR)<br />

20028.C.T.R.Hayward,‘<strong>Philo</strong>,theSeptuagint<strong>of</strong>Genesis32:24–32<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Name ‘Israel’: Fighting the Passions, Inspiration <strong>and</strong> the Vision<br />

<strong>of</strong> God,’ Journal <strong>of</strong> Jewish Studies 51 (2000) 209–226.<br />

<strong>Philo</strong>’s underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the etymology <strong>of</strong> Israel as ‘[the] one who sees God’<br />

occurs frequently throughout his work <strong>and</strong> appears to derive from an earlier<br />

tradition. Because the Septuagint is central to <strong>Philo</strong>’s exegesis, Hayward explores<br />

how <strong>Philo</strong> uses the LXX in relation to his discussions <strong>of</strong> Israel. Although <strong>Philo</strong><br />

does not use the LXX to explain the link between Israel <strong>and</strong> ‘seeing God,’ he<br />

draws from the LXX several other themes, which he develops in connection<br />

with Israel. These themes include the portrayal <strong>of</strong> Jacob as a wrestler <strong>and</strong> athlete;<br />

Israel’s name change as ‘a blessing uttered in prophecy’ (p. 215); <strong>and</strong>, especially,<br />

Israel’s role as a ‘boundary figure’ between heavenly <strong>and</strong> earthly things—a role<br />

similar to that played by the Logos, the high priest, <strong>and</strong> the first man. In addition,<br />

<strong>Philo</strong> uses the episode at Bethel (Gen 28) rather than the one at Penuel (Gen 32)<br />

to illustrate the experience <strong>of</strong> Israel as ‘the one who sees God.’ Underlying these<br />

various complex associations may be an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> divine inspiration,<br />

which <strong>Philo</strong> himself may have experienced. In turn, this experience may account

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!