02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214 part two<br />

20250. C.Hayes,Gentile Impurities <strong>and</strong> Jewish Identities: Intermarriage<br />

<strong>and</strong> Conversion from the Bible to the Talmud (Oxford 2002).<br />

Jewish notions <strong>of</strong> Gentile impurity are integral to the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> group<br />

identity because these notions influence ideas about whether <strong>and</strong> how non-Jews<br />

can join the Jewish community. Indeed controversies on these questions ‘led<br />

to the rise <strong>of</strong> sectarianism in the Second Temple period <strong>and</strong>, ultimately, to the<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> Christianity <strong>and</strong> Judaism’ (p. 10). Hayes identifies different kinds <strong>of</strong><br />

purity/impurity, including ritual, moral, <strong>and</strong> genealogical. In Part I she examines<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> Gentile impurity in the Bible <strong>and</strong> various Second Temple sources<br />

<strong>and</strong> then considers implications regarding intermarriage <strong>and</strong> conversion. She<br />

also examines the positions <strong>of</strong> Paul <strong>and</strong> early Church Fathers. Part II is devoted<br />

to rabbinic views <strong>of</strong> Gentile impurity, intermarriage, <strong>and</strong> conversion. Hayes<br />

argues against earlier scholars who claim that it is ritual impurity that Jews most<br />

commonly associate with non-Jews. Instead she maintains that it is genealogical<br />

purity that concerns Ezra, Jubilees, <strong>and</strong>4QMMT,whileotherSecondTemple<br />

sources, the Rabbis, <strong>and</strong> Paul emphasize the moral factor. <strong>Philo</strong> exemplifies this<br />

concern with moral—rather than ritual or genealogical—purity/impurity, <strong>and</strong><br />

he underst<strong>and</strong>s conversion as ‘a passage from impiety to piety (moral impurity<br />

to moral purity)’ (p. 57). Likewise <strong>Philo</strong>’s explanation <strong>of</strong> the prohibition against<br />

intermarriage is based on ‘the deleterious moral-religious effect it may have on<br />

theIsraelitepartner’(p.70).Reviews:M.L.Satlow,SPhA 16 (2004) 309–315.<br />

(EB)<br />

20251.L.R.Helyer,Exploring Jewish Literature <strong>of</strong> the Second Temple<br />

Period. A Guide for New Testament Students (Downers Grove Ill. 2002),<br />

esp. 311–335.<br />

The stated purpose <strong>of</strong> this book is to provide undergraduates, seminary<br />

students, pastors <strong>and</strong> interested lay-persons an introduction to Jewish writings<br />

important for an underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the New Testament. It deals primarily with<br />

selections from Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, Dead Sea Scrolls, Josephus, <strong>Philo</strong>,<br />

Bar Kochba Letters <strong>and</strong> Mishnah. The presentation is chronological, providing<br />

historical introductions to the various groups <strong>of</strong> literature. Chapter 9 deals with<br />

<strong>Philo</strong> (pp. 311–335). After a brief historical introduction, the author presents<br />

<strong>Philo</strong>’s writings. Then he discusses selected passages <strong>and</strong> their relevance for<br />

the New Testament by dealing with topics such as creation <strong>and</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong><br />

evil; the problem <strong>of</strong> circumcision; the Logos; Adam Christology; substance <strong>and</strong><br />

shadow; mysticism; <strong>and</strong> allegorical interpretation. The Chapter ends with some<br />

suggestions for further reading. (TS)<br />

20252. I. Himbaza, ‘Le Décalogue de Papyrus Nash, <strong>Philo</strong>n, 4 Qphyl<br />

G, 8Qphyl 3, et 4Qmez A,’ Revue de Qumran 79 (2002) 411–428.<br />

A comparative study <strong>of</strong> the texts cited in the title <strong>of</strong> the article demonstrates<br />

that the form <strong>of</strong> the Decalogue that they represent st<strong>and</strong>s closer to the version<br />

<strong>of</strong> Exodus than to that <strong>of</strong> Deuteronomy, <strong>and</strong> that this Decalogue is closer to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!