02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 part two<br />

the text. First, within the commentary sections <strong>of</strong> the treatise (§§ 28–36, 54–79,<br />

125–156) the high moral value <strong>of</strong> the politicus is relativized by the ontological<br />

inferiority <strong>of</strong> the political world. Second, in the narrative sections <strong>of</strong> the treatise<br />

(§§ 2–27, 37–53, 80–124, 157–268), the figure <strong>of</strong> Joseph displays a number <strong>of</strong><br />

characteristics that belong to the pious biblical hero rather than to the πλιτικς<br />

<strong>of</strong> the commentary sections. Third, in the final narrative section <strong>and</strong> conclusion,<br />

<strong>Philo</strong> displaces the portrait <strong>of</strong> the commentary sections through two speeches<br />

<strong>of</strong> Joseph (§§ 238–245 <strong>and</strong> 262–266) <strong>and</strong> two final assessments (§§ 246–249 <strong>and</strong><br />

268–270). Can these different images <strong>of</strong> Joseph merge into a synthetic figure <strong>of</strong><br />

an ideal politicus judaeus? Neither the composition <strong>of</strong> the text nor a comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> Joseph with Moses suggest that they can. The politicus graecus is immersed<br />

in the material world <strong>and</strong> cannot be fully unified with Jewish piety. The figure<br />

<strong>of</strong> Joseph represents a distinctive spiritual experience. (DTR; based on author’s<br />

summary)<br />

20241.K.Fuglseth,ASectarian John? A Sociological-Critical, Historical<br />

<strong>and</strong> Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Gospel <strong>of</strong> John, <strong>Philo</strong> <strong>and</strong> Qumran<br />

(diss. University <strong>of</strong> Trondheim 2002).<br />

Dissertation version <strong>of</strong> a doctoral thesis presented to The Norwegian University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Science <strong>and</strong> Technology, Trondheim, Norway, for the degree <strong>of</strong> Dr. art.<br />

in 2002 under the supervision <strong>of</strong> Peder Borgen <strong>and</strong> Jarl H. Ulrichsen. For the<br />

version published as a monograph see below 20525, where a detailed summary<br />

is given. (TS)<br />

20242. A. C. Geljon, ‘Mozes als Platoonse Stoïcijn,’ Hermeneus 74<br />

(2002) 344–353.<br />

This article focuses on the presentation <strong>of</strong> Moses as a Stoic sage <strong>and</strong> a<br />

Platonic philosopher-king in <strong>Philo</strong>. The four functions that <strong>Philo</strong> ascribes to<br />

Moses—philosopher-king, lawgiver, high priest, prophet—have a Stoic background.<br />

<strong>Philo</strong> attributes Platonic–Stoic virtues to Moses, such as self-restraint,<br />

temperance, <strong>and</strong> justice. Describing Moses’ youth in Mos., <strong>Philo</strong> depicts him as<br />

subduing the passions with self-control, just as a Stoic sage would do. When<br />

Moses stays in Midian he practices the theoretical life <strong>and</strong> tries to live according<br />

to the right reason <strong>of</strong> nature. Having attained the ideal <strong>of</strong> the Stoic sage totally,<br />

Mosesisthesapiens, whereas his brother Aaron plays the role <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>iciens,<br />

who is still under way, unable to reach the final goal. (ACG)<br />

20243. A.C.Geljon,<strong>Philo</strong>nic Exegesis in Gregory <strong>of</strong> Nyssa’s De vita<br />

Moysis, Brown Judaic Series 333: Studia <strong>Philo</strong>nica Monographs 5 (Providence<br />

RI 2002).<br />

This book is a revised version <strong>of</strong> the author’s 2000 Leiden doctoral dissertation:<br />

see above 20024. In the first part <strong>of</strong> this study, the author argues that<br />

<strong>Philo</strong>’s biography <strong>of</strong> Moses, Mos., is not part <strong>of</strong> the so-called Exposition <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!