02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 part two<br />

20174. G. E. Sterling, ‘Ontology versus Eschatology: Tensions between<br />

Author <strong>and</strong> Community,’ in D. T. Runia <strong>and</strong> G. E. Sterling (edd.),<br />

In the Spirit <strong>of</strong> Faith: Studies in <strong>Philo</strong> <strong>and</strong> Early Christianity in Honor<br />

<strong>of</strong> David Hay [= The Studia <strong>Philo</strong>nica Annual 13 (2001)], BrownJudaic<br />

Studies 332 (Providence RI 2001) 190–211, esp. 199–204.<br />

After sketching the status quaestionis with regard to the possible relationship<br />

between <strong>Philo</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Epistle to the Hebrews, the author formulates his<br />

intention with this article as follows: to ‘address the relationship between Platonic<br />

ontology <strong>and</strong> Christian eschatology in Hebrews by examining the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the tabernacle in Heb 8:1–10:18’. A detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> Heb 8:1–5, 9:1–10, 9;11,<br />

9:23–24 <strong>and</strong> 10:1 is followed by a discussion <strong>of</strong> the tabernacle in <strong>Philo</strong> (including<br />

a comparison with Josephus’ description) <strong>and</strong> in apocalyptic traditions.<br />

In Hebrews a vertical/spatial orientation (in line with Platonic ontology) <strong>and</strong><br />

a linear/temporal orientation (<strong>of</strong> Christian eschatology) can be distinguished.<br />

The author is ‘convinced that the spatial dimension is indebted to Platonizing<br />

exegetical traditions’. His conclusion is that Hebrews ‘does not reflect a pr<strong>of</strong>ound<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Platonism; it only betrays a knowledge <strong>of</strong> Platonizing exegetical<br />

traditions. (. . .) It indicates that Platonism (. . .) had become common coin in<br />

some exegetical circles among Jews <strong>and</strong> Christians. This means that <strong>Philo</strong> should<br />

not be read as a solitary figure, but as the most sophisticated representative <strong>of</strong> a<br />

larger tradition <strong>of</strong> exegesis.’ (HMK)<br />

20175. J.E.Taylor,‘TheCommunity<strong>of</strong>GoodsamongtheFirst<br />

Christians <strong>and</strong> among the Essenes,’ in D. Goodblatt, A. Pinnick <strong>and</strong><br />

D. R. Schwartz (edd.), Historical Perspectives; from the Hasmoneans to<br />

BarKokhbainLight<strong>of</strong>theDeadSeaScrolls(Leiden 2001) 147–161.<br />

The author discusses texts from Acts about the community <strong>of</strong> life among<br />

the first Christians. They had a radical form <strong>of</strong> common life <strong>and</strong> property. This<br />

description is compared with <strong>Philo</strong>’s text about the Essenes in the Hypothetica<br />

preserved by Eusebius (PE 8.11). Taylor concludes that the way <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Christians as described in Acts closely resembles that <strong>of</strong> the Essenes. (ACG)<br />

20176. J. E. Taylor, ‘Virgin Mothers: <strong>Philo</strong> on the Women Therapeutae,’<br />

Journal for the Study <strong>of</strong> the Pseudepigrapha 12 (2001) 37–63.<br />

<strong>Philo</strong>’s De vita contemplativa is a highly rhetorical piece <strong>and</strong> it is valuable<br />

to explore the relation between the rhetoric <strong>and</strong> the historical reality to which<br />

it points. Taylor’s article, which explores themes dealt with at greater length<br />

in her subsequent monograph (see below 203122), focuses on the role <strong>of</strong><br />

women in <strong>Philo</strong>’s account. It is plain that <strong>Philo</strong>’s purpose was to describe the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the Therapeutae community as ‘good’. But how could he do this<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> the women members <strong>and</strong> at the same time hold on to his own<br />

gender theory, in which women were regarded as less philosophical? In the<br />

first part <strong>of</strong> the article <strong>Philo</strong>’s conception <strong>of</strong> women in general is treated. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!