Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

258 part two 20365. P.W.vanderHorst,‘CommonPrayerinPhilo’sIn Flaccum 121–124,’ in J. Tabory (ed), Kenishta: Studies of the Synagogue World, vol. 2 (Ramat-Gan 2003) 21–28 (English section). The article presents a thumbnail analysis of Flacc. 121–124, Philo’s account of the public prayer(s) of the Alexandrian Jewish community following the announcement of the arrest of Flaccus. Following his observation of a certain parallelism with the subsequent confession of Flaccus himself (§§ 170–175), the author discusses the oft-remarked tone of Schadenfreude in the prayers. With reference to biblical and Jewish liturgical sources, Van der Horst argues the character of the passage should be understood within the context of prayers of thanksgiving, acknowledging divine sovereignty and providence. (DS) 20366. W. Houston, ‘Towards an Integrated Reading of the Dietary Laws of Leviticus,’ in R. Rendtorff and R. A. Kugler (edd.), The Book of Leviticus, Vetus Testamentum Supplements 93 (Leiden 2003) 142– 161. The author examines the interpretation of the dietary laws in Leviticus by Philo of Alexandria and the modern interpreters Jacob Milgrom and Mary Douglas. All three see the ritual and moral teaching of Leviticus as a unified whole. In Spec. Philo treats the particular laws under the heading of one of the Ten Commandments. The dietary laws fall under the tenth commandment, κ πιυμήσεις. Houston briefly discusses Philo’s reading of the precepts, and concludes that Philo regards them as teaching the important virtues of temperance, self-control, and humanity. In his general conclusion Houston states that ‘in their broad contentions, Philo, Milgrom and Douglas may be accounted correct’ (p. 161). Philo’s interpretation teaches us to discipline our appetites and to moderate our desires in order to preserve the ‘integrity of creation.’ (ACG) 20367.S.Hultgren,‘TheOriginofPaul’sDoctrineofthetwoAdams in 1Corinthians 15:45–49,’ Journal for the Study of the New Testament 89 (2003) 343–370, esp. 344–357. This study argues, by means of a careful analysis and summarization of Philo’s interpretations of the creation of ‘man’ in Gen 1:26–27 and 2:7, that the closest parallels to Paul’s doctrine of the two Adams in 1Cor 15:45–49 are not to be found in Philo, a misreading of Philo, or Gnosticism, but in rabbinic literature. (KAF) 20368. S.Inowlocki,La citation comme méthode apologétique: les auteurs juifs dans l’ Apodeixis d’Eusèbe de Césarée (diss. Free University Brussels 2003).
critical studies 2003 259 This doctoral dissertation prepared at the Free University of Brussels forms the main body of research on which the author’s monograph published by Brill in English in 2006 is based; see below 20643. The study deals with Eusebius of Caesarea’s use of the Jewish authors’ quotations in the Praeparatio evangelica (PE) and the Demonstratio evangelica (DE). These authors include Philo of Alexandria, Flavius Josephus, Aristobulus, and the so-called ‘minor’ Jewish authors (Eupolemus, Ezekiel the Tragedian, Artapanus etc.). The study aims to shed new light on the quotation process as exploited by the bishop of Caesarea through the particular case of the Jewish authors. Eusebius’ treatment of Philo occupies an important part of this study because of the abundance of Philonic testimonies cited by Eusebius, especially in the PE. Each Jewish author is not treated separately. Instead, the viewpoint from which Eusebius sees them is adopted. In most cases, Philo is presented by the latter as a ‘Hebrew.’ The author argues that this appellation constitutes a crucial rhetorical device in order to appropriate Philo’s texts. According to the author’s analysis, Eusebius’ insistence on Philo’s ‘Hebrew-ness’ in the PE enables him to turn the philosopher into a most useful predecessor, the pre-Christian theologian par excellence. The passages in which he deals with the Logos are especially useful in this respect, since he identifies Philo’s Logos as Christ. However, Eusebius’ endeavour is not only a theological one, but also, and more importantly, an apologetic one: his re-interpretation of Philo enables him to demonstrate that Christianity is a unified theological system more ancient, hence better, than that of the Greeks. At the same time, the synthesis made by Philo between the Jewish Scripture and Greek philosophy enables Eusebius to compare Christian and Greek philosophy. Therefore, Philo becomes a most important link between Christianity and Hellenism. In the DE, on the other hand, Philo is mentioned only once, in a historical-apologetic context. It is argued that this passage accurately illustrates the manner in which Eusebius occasionally distorts quotations of Jewish authors for apologetic purposes in the DE. With regard to the text of Eusebius’ citations in the PE,hegenerally proves to cite Philo faithfully, although certain differences between Philo’s and Eusebius’ manuscripts seem to indicate that Eusebius occasionally modified Philo’s text in theologically significant passages. The author also argues that if Eusebius certainly knew Philo first hand, he may have collected excerpts in the form of florilegia for his own use. Finally, the author insists on Eusebius’ originality in dealing with Philo: not only did he use theological and historical passages that were rarely quoted by the Church Fathers, but he also explicitly acknowledged, as it were, the debt of Christianity to Philo. Yet one should bear in mind that Eusebius’ use of Philo in the PE and the DE was above all apologetic. (DTR; based on the author’s summary) 20369. H.Jacobson,‘αραν or αραδ in Philo’s QG,’ Journal of Theological Studies 54 (2003) 158–159. In the Armenian translation of QG 3.36 Philo is reported as explaining the place name αραν at Gen 16:14, but the actual biblical text in both the MT and the LXX reads αραδ. In a brief note the author argues that it is very unlikely that this reflects a variation of readings in the LXX. Translation of the Armenian text,
Page 1 and 2:
Philo of Alexandria
Page 3 and 4:
Philo of Alexandria An Annotated Bi
Page 5:
CONTENTS Preface ..................
Page 8 and 9:
viii preface Provisional versions o
Page 10 and 11:
x introduction years), T. Seland (9
Page 12 and 13:
xii introduction The present work c
Page 14 and 15:
xiv introduction Part One have been
Page 16 and 17:
xvi introduction 2002 103 2003 139
Page 18 and 19:
xviii contributors David Satran is
Page 20 and 21:
xx abbreviations 2. Philonic Editio
Page 22 and 23:
xxii abbreviations EvQ Evangelical
Page 24 and 25:
xxiv abbreviations RThL Revue Théo
Page 27:
PART ONE Bibliographies Editions Fr
Page 30 and 31:
4 partone with its predecessor is t
Page 32 and 33:
6 partone 2. Other Bibliographies 1
Page 34 and 35:
8 partone 1831. H. Harrauer, ‘Ein
Page 36 and 37:
10 part one 3. French Translations
Page 38 and 39:
12 part one b. Translation of Singl
Page 40 and 41:
14 part one 11. Chinese Translation
Page 42 and 43:
16 part one This anthology contains
Page 44 and 45:
18 part one 3109.P.W.vanderHorst,Ph
Page 46 and 47:
20 part one This printed Key-Word-I
Page 48 and 49:
22 part one 3321. D.T.Runia,G.E.Ste
Page 50 and 51:
24 part one Blog established by Tor
Page 53 and 54:
1997 9701. Monique Alexandre, ‘Du
Page 55 and 56:
critical studies 1997 29 9706. P.Bo
Page 57 and 58:
critical studies 1997 31 Origen’s
Page 59 and 60:
critical studies 1997 33 9716.J.M.D
Page 61 and 62:
critical studies 1997 35 9721. P.Ga
Page 63 and 64:
critical studies 1997 37 Philo’s
Page 65 and 66:
critical studies 1997 39 home, are
Page 67 and 68:
critical studies 1997 41 discusses
Page 69 and 70:
critical studies 1997 43 The concep
Page 71 and 72:
critical studies 1997 45 to the Chr
Page 73 and 74:
critical studies 1997 47 Reprint of
Page 75 and 76:
critical studies 1997 49 One Cosmos
Page 77 and 78:
critical studies 1997 51 of variati
Page 79 and 80:
critical studies 1997 53 examples o
Page 81 and 82:
critical studies 1997 55 Philo does
Page 83 and 84:
critical studies 1997 57 the Logos
Page 85 and 86:
critical studies 1997 59 Judaism pr
Page 87 and 88:
1998 9801. D.H.Akenson,Surpassing W
Page 89 and 90:
critical studies 1998 63 9806. C. A
Page 91 and 92:
critical studies 1998 65 onthecaseo
Page 93 and 94:
critical studies 1998 67 of Helleni
Page 95 and 96:
critical studies 1998 69 ical scena
Page 97 and 98:
critical studies 1998 71 in Stromat
Page 99 and 100:
critical studies 1998 73 Philo habi
Page 101 and 102:
critical studies 1998 75 9840.F.Deu
Page 103 and 104:
critical studies 1998 77 d’Alexan
Page 105 and 106:
critical studies 1998 79 9852. J.-G
Page 107 and 108:
critical studies 1998 81 This is a
Page 109 and 110:
critical studies 1998 83 Leloup, fi
Page 111 and 112:
critical studies 1998 85 Deuteronom
Page 113 and 114:
critical studies 1998 87 9875.H.Naj
Page 115 and 116:
critical studies 1998 89 names, ε
Page 117 and 118:
critical studies 1998 91 philosophy
Page 119 and 120:
critical studies 1998 93 9894.H.G.S
Page 121 and 122:
critical studies 1998 95 98100. J.
Page 123 and 124:
critical studies 1998 97 ritual Tor
Page 125 and 126:
critical studies 1998 99 Plato, Cic
Page 127 and 128:
critical studies 1999 101 9904. G.B
Page 129 and 130:
critical studies 1999 103 indubitab
Page 131 and 132:
critical studies 1999 105 9918. Y.
Page 133 and 134:
critical studies 1999 107 specially
Page 135 and 136:
critical studies 1999 109 presided
Page 137 and 138:
critical studies 1999 111 of Bos’
Page 139 and 140:
critical studies 1999 113 9941. A.K
Page 141 and 142:
critical studies 1999 115 Pentateuc
Page 143 and 144:
critical studies 1999 117 in the Wi
Page 145 and 146:
critical studies 1999 119 As part o
Page 147 and 148:
critical studies 1999 121 This mono
Page 149 and 150:
critical studies 1999 123 When the
Page 151 and 152:
critical studies 1999 125 The autho
Page 153 and 154:
critical studies 1999 127 In his tr
Page 155 and 156:
critical studies 2000 129 tians 3:6
Page 157 and 158:
critical studies 2000 131 20009.A.P
Page 159 and 160:
critical studies 2000 133 of a pers
Page 161 and 162:
critical studies 2000 135 evidence
Page 163 and 164:
critical studies 2000 137 earlier h
Page 165 and 166:
critical studies 2000 139 20032.P.W
Page 167 and 168:
critical studies 2000 141 Although
Page 169 and 170:
critical studies 2000 143 Commentar
Page 171 and 172:
critical studies 2000 145 which is
Page 173 and 174:
critical studies 2000 147 own absol
Page 175 and 176:
critical studies 2000 149 20058. A.
Page 177 and 178:
critical studies 2000 151 city, so
Page 179 and 180:
critical studies 2000 153 Alexandri
Page 181 and 182:
critical studies 2000 155 men’ bu
Page 183 and 184:
critical studies 2000 157 the Alexa
Page 185 and 186:
2001 20101. S.P.Ahearne-Kroll,‘
Page 187 and 188:
critical studies 2001 161 Christian
Page 189 and 190:
critical studies 2001 163 text of S
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
critical studies 2001 167 This diss
Page 195 and 196:
critical studies 2001 169 Hay notes
Page 197 and 198:
critical studies 2001 171 The artic
Page 199 and 200:
critical studies 2001 173 Conversio
Page 201 and 202:
critical studies 2001 175 of which
Page 203 and 204:
critical studies 2001 177 class. Pa
Page 205 and 206:
critical studies 2001 179 20151. T.
Page 207 and 208:
critical studies 2001 181 Origins o
Page 209 and 210:
critical studies 2001 183 20161. D.
Page 211 and 212:
critical studies 2001 185 20167. F.
Page 213 and 214:
critical studies 2001 187 Two focus
Page 215 and 216:
critical studies 2001 189 author ob
Page 217 and 218:
critical studies 2001 191 This pape
Page 219 and 220:
critical studies 2001 193 should be
Page 221 and 222:
2002 20201. R. Abush, ‘Eunuchs an
Page 223 and 224:
critical studies 2002 197 Gentiles
Page 225 and 226:
critical studies 2002 199 20211. K.
Page 227 and 228:
critical studies 2002 201 are drawn
Page 229 and 230:
critical studies 2002 203 his readi
Page 231 and 232:
critical studies 2002 205 philosoph
Page 233 and 234: critical studies 2002 207 are the f
Page 235 and 236: critical studies 2002 209 The autho
Page 237 and 238: critical studies 2002 211 Law, as i
Page 239 and 240: critical studies 2002 213 and exhib
Page 241 and 242: critical studies 2002 215 LXX than
Page 243 and 244: critical studies 2002 217 tradition
Page 245 and 246: critical studies 2002 219 20263. J.
Page 247 and 248: critical studies 2002 221 20270. L.
Page 249 and 250: critical studies 2002 223 passions
Page 251 and 252: critical studies 2002 225 of termin
Page 253 and 254: critical studies 2002 227 mastered
Page 255 and 256: critical studies 2002 229 material
Page 257 and 258: critical studies 2002 231 20295. G.
Page 259 and 260: critical studies 2002 233 202100. D
Page 261 and 262: critical studies 2003 235 roleofthe
Page 263 and 264: critical studies 2003 237 rankontro
Page 265 and 266: critical studies 2003 239 ror: Refl
Page 267 and 268: critical studies 2003 241 20320. D.
Page 269 and 270: critical studies 2003 243 In this a
Page 271 and 272: critical studies 2003 245 Origen. T
Page 273 and 274: critical studies 2003 247 20336. W.
Page 275 and 276: critical studies 2003 249 Canaanite
Page 277 and 278: critical studies 2003 251 Noah is s
Page 279 and 280: critical studies 2003 253 20353. K.
Page 281 and 282: critical studies 2003 255 The first
Page 283: critical studies 2003 257 20362. J.
Page 287 and 288: critical studies 2003 261 For this
Page 289 and 290: critical studies 2003 263 and as Go
Page 291 and 292: critical studies 2003 265 20384. A.
Page 293 and 294: critical studies 2003 267 copies of
Page 295 and 296: critical studies 2003 269 sented by
Page 297 and 298: critical studies 2003 271 20399. M.
Page 299 and 300: critical studies 2003 273 the one h
Page 301 and 302: critical studies 2003 275 203111.D.
Page 303 and 304: critical studies 2003 277 203117. F
Page 305 and 306: critical studies 2003 279 Recognizi
Page 307 and 308: critical studies 2003 281 Christian
Page 309 and 310: critical studies 2003 283 203133. H
Page 311 and 312: 2004 20401. F. Alesse, ‘Il luogo
Page 313 and 314: critical studies 2004 287 that the
Page 315 and 316: critical studies 2004 289 reviews t
Page 317 and 318: critical studies 2004 291 parallel
Page 319 and 320: critical studies 2004 293 20421.N.C
Page 321 and 322: critical studies 2004 295 sovereign
Page 325 and 326: critical studies 2004 299 that Phil
Page 327 and 328: critical studies 2004 301 connectio
Page 331 and 332: critical studies 2004 305 2003. Van
Page 333 and 334: critical studies 2004 307 20455.H.J
Page 335 and 336:
critical studies 2004 309 culture s
Page 337 and 338:
critical studies 2004 311 20466. G.
Page 339 and 340:
critical studies 2004 313 20471.J.L
Page 341 and 342:
critical studies 2004 315 After a b
Page 343 and 344:
critical studies 2004 317 of the Ge
Page 345 and 346:
critical studies 2004 319 represent
Page 347 and 348:
critical studies 2004 321 and forem
Page 349 and 350:
critical studies 2004 323 20496. S.
Page 351 and 352:
critical studies 2004 325 del Grupp
Page 353 and 354:
critical studies 2004 327 204106. D
Page 355 and 356:
critical studies 2004 329 204112.D.
Page 357 and 358:
critical studies 2004 331 mouthpiec
Page 359 and 360:
critical studies 2004 333 Jewish au
Page 361 and 362:
critical studies 2004 335 bate by c
Page 363 and 364:
critical studies 2004 337 Alessandr
Page 365 and 366:
critical studies 2004 339 R. A. Cle
Page 367 and 368:
critical studies 2004 341 human can
Page 369 and 370:
critical studies 2005 343 20505. H.
Page 371 and 372:
critical studies 2005 345 and Jacob
Page 373 and 374:
critical studies 2005 347 this syst
Page 375 and 376:
critical studies 2005 349 20522. J.
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
critical studies 2005 353 its Helle
Page 381 and 382:
critical studies 2005 355 mentions
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
critical studies 2005 359 author su
Page 387 and 388:
critical studies 2005 361 20551.M.M
Page 389 and 390:
critical studies 2005 363 20557. M.
Page 391 and 392:
critical studies 2005 365 studies c
Page 393 and 394:
critical studies 2005 367 with assi
Page 395 and 396:
critical studies 2005 369 it is hie
Page 397 and 398:
critical studies 2005 371 This volu
Page 399 and 400:
critical studies 2005 373 Aphrahat,
Page 401 and 402:
2006 20601. S. Ahbel-Rappe, ‘Plat
Page 403 and 404:
critical studies 2006 377 20607. P.
Page 405 and 406:
critical studies 2006 379 system of
Page 407 and 408:
critical studies 2006 381 other; th
Page 409 and 410:
critical studies 2006 383 Dinah’
Page 411 and 412:
critical studies 2006 385 Fuglseth
Page 413 and 414:
critical studies 2006 387 Hebrew. I
Page 415 and 416:
critical studies 2006 389 20642. P.
Page 417 and 418:
critical studies 2006 391 as philos
Page 419 and 420:
critical studies 2006 393 20654. C.
Page 421 and 422:
critical studies 2006 395 of Greek
Page 423 and 424:
critical studies 2006 397 20666. M.
Page 425 and 426:
critical studies 2006 399 comparing
Page 427 and 428:
critical studies 2006 401 can be ex
Page 429 and 430:
critical studies 2006 403 theologic
Page 431 and 432:
critical studies 2006 405 (νμς
Page 433 and 434:
critical studies 2006 407 has been
Page 435 and 436:
critical studies 2006 409 20695. O.
Page 437 and 438:
critical studies 2006 411 206100. M
Page 439:
PART THREE 1987-1996 Additional Ite
Page 442 and 443:
416 part three 1990 a9078. B. Centr
Page 444 and 445:
418 part three a9389.V.W.Rutkowski,
Page 446 and 447:
420 part three Brief remarks on Phi
Page 448 and 449:
422 part three of Abraham. If so, t
Page 450 and 451:
424 part three that al-Qirqisani kn
Page 452 and 453:
426 part three some Jews. The autho
Page 454 and 455:
428 part three a96115. D. I. Sly,
Page 457 and 458:
B. CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA 1987-1996
Page 459 and 460:
corrigenda and addenda 1987-1996 43
Page 461 and 462:
1. Index of Authors 2. Index of Rev
Page 463 and 464:
Bouffartigue, J. 9825 Bow, B. A. 20
Page 465 and 466:
Ferguson, E. 9936*, 20348 Fernánde
Page 467 and 468:
Jung, F. 20255 Jungbauer, H. 20036
Page 469 and 470:
Muller, M. 2901* Müller, U. B. 997
Page 471 and 472:
Schaberg, J. 204127* Schäfer, P. 9
Page 473 and 474:
Wasserstein, D. J. 20698* Water, R.
Page 475 and 476:
Levison, J. 3321 Loades, A. 203122
Page 477 and 478:
17:6 203104 18 20323, 203118 18-19
Page 479 and 480:
Luke 1 9784 4:16-30 20056 9:59-60 2
Page 481 and 482:
46 20697 53-56 3021 62-70 3021 66 2
Page 483 and 484:
60-61 20489 66-70 20658 70 20401 72
Page 485 and 486:
Mos. 1.1-2 20495 1.1-24 2502 1.8 20
Page 487 and 488:
Contempl. 1 20210, 20407 2 9862, 20
Page 489 and 490:
name of 9833 obedience of 20221 Act
Page 491 and 492:
Balaam 204117 interpretations of 99
Page 493 and 494:
English translation 2158 French tra
Page 495 and 496:
Dürckheim, K. G. 9862 dynameis—s
Page 497 and 498:
vision of 9826 wisdom of 204121 wra
Page 499 and 500:
as ‘mother-city’ 20494 as Philo
Page 501 and 502:
laws, dietary 20366, 203105 Leisega
Page 503 and 504:
Nag Hammadi 20659, 20396 Spanish tr
Page 505 and 506:
Philo general account of in Chinese
Page 507 and 508:
Pseudo-Hippolytus 20379 Pseudo-Long
Page 509 and 510:
in Augustine and Philo 20021 Sirach
Page 511 and 512:
as plan of creation 9784 polemics a
Page 513 and 514:
νς 98103 εδς 20476 εδωλν
Page 515 and 516:
πατρίς 20465 πίστις 202
Page 517 and 518:
index of contributors 491 20660, 20
show all

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?