02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

374 part two<br />

terminology used for foreign gods, in which <strong>Philo</strong>’s use <strong>of</strong> the terms εδωλα,<br />

επλαστεν <strong>and</strong> εί is also investigated. It is only against the background <strong>of</strong><br />

a Platonic world-view that the term εδωλν can have the double signification<br />

<strong>of</strong> ‘a divine image’ <strong>and</strong> ‘phantom’. The designation <strong>of</strong> the stars as ε ασητί,<br />

however, is conventional <strong>and</strong> does not imply veneration. On pp. 123–126 <strong>Philo</strong>’s<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> faith is outlined: it comprises knowledge <strong>of</strong> God, trust in God, <strong>and</strong><br />

conversion as well. On pp. 133–138 F. Siegert’s thesis that QE 2.2 betrays the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> polytheistic sympathizers <strong>of</strong> the Hellenistic synagogue is contested.<br />

Jethro, however, could be the symbol <strong>of</strong> such an exterior circle <strong>of</strong> adherents.<br />

Further references to <strong>Philo</strong>’s doctrine <strong>of</strong> monotheism are found on pp. 174–176<br />

<strong>and</strong> 397–401. The author observes a tendency to abstract from God’s activity<br />

in history; in contrast to Stoicism, <strong>Philo</strong> confines the knowledge <strong>of</strong> a Creator’s<br />

existence to the intellectual inference <strong>of</strong> philosophers. (GS)<br />

20584.A.T.Wright,The Origin <strong>of</strong> Evil Spirits: the Reception <strong>of</strong> Genesis<br />

6.1–4 in Early Jewish Literature, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum<br />

Neuen Testament 2.198 (Tübingen 2005), esp. 191–219.<br />

The monograph is a revision <strong>of</strong> the author’s 2004 dissertation submitted to the<br />

faculty at the University <strong>of</strong> Durham. In order to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>Philo</strong>’s place in Early<br />

Judaism <strong>and</strong> his approach to Gen 6:1–4, <strong>Philo</strong>’s role as an exegete, his audience,<br />

<strong>and</strong> his view <strong>of</strong> the soul, <strong>and</strong> in particular its immortality, are discussed. <strong>Philo</strong>’s<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text <strong>of</strong>fers an alternative approach to the responsibility for<br />

human suffering to the tradition set forth in 1Enoch1–36. The Watcher tradition<br />

describes the ‘angels <strong>of</strong> God’ as rebellious angels who entered the human realm<br />

to fornicate with women. <strong>Philo</strong> interprets them as ‘souls’ that descend to earth<br />

to take on a human body. For <strong>Philo</strong>, the giants are neither physical nor spiritual<br />

entities. They are irrational vices born as a result <strong>of</strong> being drawn into the torrents<br />

<strong>of</strong> the flesh. Despite differences, the giants <strong>of</strong> the Watcher tradition <strong>and</strong> the giants<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gig. threaten the survival <strong>of</strong> humanity, although one is external <strong>and</strong> the other<br />

internal to the person. <strong>Philo</strong> may have been writing a corrective to Watcher<br />

tradition <strong>and</strong> its view that evil spirits are the cause <strong>of</strong> human sufferings. (KAF)<br />

20585. A.T.Wright,‘SomeObservationson<strong>Philo</strong>’sDe Gigantibus<br />

<strong>and</strong> Evil Spirits in Second Temple Judaism,’ Journal for the Study <strong>of</strong><br />

Judaism 36 (2005) 471–488.<br />

This article is taken almost verbatim from the monograph summarized above<br />

at 20584. (KAF)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!