02.07.2013 Views

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

Philo of Alexandria - Books and Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

critical studies 2003 235<br />

role<strong>of</strong>themassesisanalyzedinrelationtothekeyword‘market-place.’The<br />

author underlines Jewish pluralism. Judaism is not a uniform block; different<br />

groups have different interests. He shows that exchange <strong>of</strong> religious ideas occurs<br />

not only in the intellectual upper class <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alex<strong>and</strong>ria</strong>. On the other h<strong>and</strong> it is<br />

argued that, in contrast to the situation in Asia Minor, the political background<br />

fosters the outbreak <strong>of</strong> the riots. The social order had been disturbed from the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the Roman era, allowing the ‘market-place’ to become a theatre <strong>of</strong><br />

war. (GS)<br />

20305.H.Amirav,Rhetoric <strong>and</strong> Tradition: John Chrysostom on Noah<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Flood, Traditio Exegetica Graeca 12 (Leuven 2003), passim.<br />

In the analysis <strong>of</strong> John Chrysostom’s homilies on Noah <strong>and</strong> the flood (ns.<br />

22–24), the author makes frequent brief references to <strong>Philo</strong>’s exegesis. (ACG)<br />

20306. J.A.Arieti<strong>and</strong>P.A.Wilson,The Scientific <strong>and</strong> the Divine:<br />

Conflict <strong>and</strong> Reconciliation from Ancient Greece to the Present (Lanham<br />

Md. 2003).<br />

In their preface, the authors identify several approaches to the relationship<br />

between science <strong>and</strong> religion: denying the divine, denying science, underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

the divine as compatible with science, viewing science <strong>and</strong> religion as completely<br />

distinct spheres, <strong>and</strong> declaring the ways <strong>of</strong> God to be unknowable. Part<br />

One has chapters on the problem posed by science <strong>and</strong> religion, the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

human reason, ancient <strong>and</strong> modern science, the origin <strong>of</strong> scientific attempts to<br />

explain the world, <strong>and</strong> pagan philosophers’ attempts to reconcile science <strong>and</strong><br />

religion through their underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> God. Part Two is devoted to attempts<br />

from antiquity (Plato) through the end <strong>of</strong> the 20th century to reconcile science<br />

<strong>and</strong> religion. In this section <strong>Philo</strong> earns a chapter <strong>of</strong> his own. With Opif.<br />

as their focus, the authors explain that <strong>Philo</strong> grounds ethics in physics when<br />

he claims that Mosaic Law derives from the creator <strong>of</strong> the whole universe,<br />

<strong>and</strong> he thus views Jewish law as having universal significance. The authors<br />

discuss how <strong>Philo</strong> interprets the biblical creation account in terms <strong>of</strong> Plato’s<br />

Timaeus, <strong>and</strong> they observe that his notion <strong>of</strong> God goes beyond the realm <strong>of</strong><br />

Platonic ideas. <strong>Philo</strong>’s efforts ‘to reconcile the best scientific theories <strong>of</strong> his era<br />

with revealed religion’ were continued in the Middle Ages by Jewish, Christian,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Islamic philosophers who grappled with Aristotelian science (p. 151).<br />

(EB)<br />

20307. A.E.Arterbury,‘Abraham’sHospitalityamongJewish<strong>and</strong><br />

Early Christian Writers: a Tradition History <strong>of</strong> Gen 18:1–16 <strong>and</strong> its<br />

RelevancefortheStudy<strong>of</strong>theNewTestament,’Perspectives in Religious<br />

Studies 30 (2003) 359–376.<br />

The story <strong>of</strong> Abraham’s hospitality to the three visitors in Gen 18:1–16 was<br />

retold <strong>and</strong> interpreted by later exegetes to reflect their own interests, values, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!