03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

looked upon the shaykh as their qibla and the being to whom prosternation 722 was due<br />

(masjūd). The Shaykh propagated among them the creed of ibādat and the religious law<br />

of Bābak’s Khurramites.” 723<br />

But the crucial point in his account is that his accusation is much more pointed<br />

towards the ‘foolish disciples’ than the shaykhs. “The fools of Rūm, who are a crowd of<br />

error and a host of devilish imagination,” says Khunjī, “struck the bell of the inane claim<br />

of Christians on the roof of the monastery of the world and, like that nation gone astray,<br />

exposed their (own) trinity (thālith-i thalātha) to exemplary punishment in the<br />

nethermost hell. They openly called Shaykh Junayd ‘God (ilāh) and his son ‘Son of God<br />

(ibn-Allāh)’.” 724 Elsewhere he writes, when Uzun Hasan, after conquering Azarbaijan,<br />

let Haydar stay in Ardabil, the khalifas of his father, who came from every direction,<br />

foolishly announced ‘the glad tidings of his divinity (ulūhiyat)’; thus their 725 excessive<br />

obedience caused Shaykh Haydar to acquire bad habits and manners. 726<br />

As already warned, Khunjī’s account must be read carefully by toning down his<br />

exaggerations especially regarding his assertion that their followers assumed deity in and<br />

worshipped Junayd and Haydar. Recognizing his exaggerations, Roemer reckons this<br />

assertion of Khunjī not to be accepted at its face value. 727 This assertion rather seems to<br />

be the view of a learned sunni scholar with the zeal of orthodox sunnism, who was also<br />

directly or indirectly commissioned to blame this group for being heretics 728 , on the<br />

722<br />

sic<br />

723<br />

TA, p. 68.<br />

724<br />

TA, pp. 65-6.<br />

725<br />

Khunji says here “the obedience of the people of Rum” See TA, p. 66.<br />

726<br />

TA, p. 66.<br />

727<br />

Roemer, “The Safavid Period”, p. 208.<br />

728<br />

This point appears clearly when Khunji explains how and why Sultan Yakup dispatched his 4.000<br />

soldiers in order to fight with Shaykh Haydar. He attempts to secure the religious ground of Sultan<br />

Yakub’s decision arguing “In fact, according to the Sharī’at, the shaykh’s behaviour with regard to a<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!