03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

such as Muhammad Han Ustaclu, Abdi Beg Shamlu, Div Ali Rumlu, Nur Ali Khalifa<br />

Rumlu gradually increased while the absolute superiority of the sufis of Lāhijan eroded.<br />

It suffices to indicate the augmenting eminence of tribal qizilbash leaders saying that<br />

Shah Ismail married his three sisters; these being the three most powerful qizilbash tribal<br />

leaders: Muhammad Han Ustaclu, Abdi Beg Shamlu, and Bayram Beg Karamanlu. 938<br />

Especially by 1508, when Husayn Beg Lala was dismissed from the post of wākil, and in<br />

the next year from the post of āmir al-umarā, 939 the influence of the ‘Sufis of Lāhijan’<br />

reduced irreversibly in Safavid politics. 940 Instead, two other groups captured the<br />

dominance in state affairs: the military was in the hands of tribal war-lords while the<br />

bureaucracy and religious clergy shifted under the control of the Persian elites. 941<br />

In sum, during the concealment period and early years of Ismail’s reign, the sufis<br />

of Lāhijan were indisputably dominant in the decision making mechanism. As a natural<br />

result of this fact, they occupied principal offices of the new state. But their power and<br />

brilliant reputation did not last long; but they sooner lost their privileges. In Çaldıran, for<br />

938 Haneda, Le Châh et les Qizilbāš, p. 93, 76. From the reign of Shah Ismail onwards, the kinship ties<br />

between these tribal aristocracies and the Safavid dynasty always became an important part of Safavid<br />

polity. For an exemplary study on the kinship ties between Tekelu tribe and the dynasty see, Maria<br />

Szuppe, “Kinship Ties between the Dafavids and the Qizilbash Amirs in Late Sixteenth-Century Iran: a<br />

Case Study of the Political Career of Members of the Sharaf al-Din Oghli Tekelu Family”, in Safavid<br />

Persia, The History and Politics of an Islamic Society, ed., Charles Melville, London, New York, 1996,<br />

79-104.<br />

939 In the same year Abdal Ali Beg Dada was also dismissed from his post. After the conquest of Khorasan<br />

in 1510, Husayn Beg Lala, Dad Beg, and Bayram Beg Qaramanlu were appointed governors of several<br />

cities in the region: Husayn Beg Lala to Herat, Deded Beg to Marv, Bayram Beg to Balh. Needless to say,<br />

this was a kind of exile for them. See Aubin, “Les soufis de Lâhejân”, pp. 15-19 ; Haneda, Le Châh et les<br />

Qizilbāš, pp. 72-84.<br />

940 Aubin, “Les soufis de Lâhejân”, pp. 9-15 ; Haneda, Le Châh et les Qizilbāš, p. 84. Haneda follows their<br />

paternal and maternal lines through available sources and concludes that the descendants of the sufis of<br />

Lāhijan could never play primary role neither in the military nor in politics. They are even scarcely<br />

mentioned in the Safavid chronicles. As Haneda states, “Il est curieux, et il peut même sembler anormal,<br />

que des mentions des descendants des soufis des Lajigan, qui avait travaillé avec tel dévouement pour la<br />

fondation de l’Etat safavide, n’apparaissent ainsi peu dans les chroniques.” See I.b.i.d., pp. 82-3.<br />

941 Aubin, “Les soufis de Lâhejân”, pp. 9-11 ; Haneda, Le Châh et les Qizilbāš, pp. 93-5. For the<br />

increasing influence of Persian notables in the Safavid statecraft see especially Jean Aubin, “Etudes<br />

safavides I. Šāh Ismā’īl et les notables de l’Iraq Persan”, Journal of the Economic and Social History of<br />

the Orient, 2:1, 1959, 37-81.<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!