03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of this last section is open to speculation. 42 Indeed, the orientation of the book suggests<br />

that this section must be a later edition either by Aşıkpaşazāde himself or by someone<br />

else. Atsız argues that Aşıkpaşazāde died in 886/1481. 43 To him, all sections narrating<br />

events of Bayezid II’s reign must be a later addition. Taeschner suggests the year<br />

889/1484 for his date of death. 44 But according to Đnalcık, who establishes his view on<br />

archival evidence as well as the textual analysis of the Tevārih, he must have died after<br />

908/1502. 45 Indeed, before Inalcik this date had been already proposed by Köprülü. 46<br />

Then it is highly possible that the author of the last sections was Aşıkpaşazāde himself,<br />

but as a later addendum.<br />

The unlawful succession of Selim I, who for the first - and the only - time in the<br />

Ottoman history forced his father to abdicate and ascended to the throne, created a deep<br />

hallmark in the Ottoman historiography. A literature called Selim-nāme, 47 narrating<br />

deeds of Selim I but with a specific intention to legitimize Selim I’s usurpation<br />

appeared. Thanks to Selim’s uprising against his father, which ended in the dismissal of<br />

the legitimate sultan by his son, this era became one of the most documented periods of<br />

the Ottoman history, both in terms of archival documents and authored historical works.<br />

Dozens of narratives exclusively devoted to Selim’s deeds have been written during the<br />

reign of Selim I himself and his son Süleyman I.<br />

42<br />

For a textual analysis see V.L. Ménage, A Survey of the Early Ottoman Histories, with Studies on their<br />

Textual Problems and their Sources, II, Ph.D. Thesis, <strong>University</strong> of London, 1961, pp. 440-83.<br />

43<br />

See APZ, p. 80.<br />

44<br />

See F. Taeschner, “Ashik-pasha-zāde”, EI2.<br />

45<br />

See Halil Đnalcık, “How to Read Aşıkpaşazāde’s History”, Essays in Ottoman History, Istanbul, 1998, p.<br />

34.<br />

46<br />

See Köprülü, “Aşık Paşa-zâde”,ĐA, p. 707.<br />

47<br />

For the Selim-nāme literature and a brief description of prominent Selim-nāmes, see Ahmet Uğur,<br />

“Selim-nāmes”, in his The Reign of Sultan Selim I in the Light of the Selim-nâme Literature, Berlin: Klaus<br />

Schwarz Verlag, 1985, pp. 28-64, pp. 7-27; Şehabeddin Tekindağ, “Selîm-nâmeler”, Tarih Enstitüsü<br />

Dergisi, I, 1970, 197-231.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!