03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

would be the next sultan, their established order would continue. On the other hand<br />

Selim was dynamic, rigorous, enterprising, and warlike. They knew that during the reign<br />

of Selim they would either loose their position or have to work harder. 1516<br />

A passage in the Selimnāme of Idrīs-i Bitlisī succinctly explains the two pillars of<br />

Selim’s strategy in his struggle with his father and brothers. Idrīs says that when Selim<br />

approached to Edirne demanding to meet with his father, Bayezid declined his request<br />

and ordered him to return. But Selim insisted on his demand. According to Idrīs’ re-<br />

formulation, Selim based his claim for the throne on two pillars: first, the Porte had<br />

given up rigorous gazā policy, which had always been the core of the traditional policy<br />

from their ancestors. 1517 The Sultan had to stimulate gāzis and launch cihād campaigns<br />

in order to enlarge the realm of Islam. This the tradition of the Prophet (sünnet), was the<br />

strict order of the God on certain portion of Muslims (farz-ı kifāye) 1518 . On the other<br />

hand, the warrior-gāzis began to loose their enthusiasm and skill since they never<br />

engaged war; especially the young soldiers who never participated in a gazā were<br />

neither tasting the heroism and the religious enthusiasm of a holy war nor progressing<br />

their skills and abilities to fight. Selim accused the Porte, as reported by Idrīs, for they<br />

renounced traditional policy of the dynasty. 1519<br />

Selim’s second criticism pointed toward the viziers, if not toward the Sultan, was<br />

regarding their passive attitude in qizilbash affairs. Selim carefully constructed his line<br />

of argument in such a manner that, on one hand, he called the attention of the statesmen<br />

(erkān-ı devlet) to the rising power of Ismail and his deadly enmity regarding the<br />

1516 See, for example, CLZ, pp. 105-106.<br />

1517 Consider also HSE4, p. 11.<br />

1518 That is the strict order of God on Muslims, but not on every individual. If some portion of Muslims<br />

fulfils this order, then the others will not be responsible. If no one would fulfill, then the whole Muslim<br />

society would be punished for it.<br />

1519 IDRS, pp. 90-91. Also regard HSE4, pp. 11-12.<br />

444

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!