03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and brothers. As a matter of fact, as will be indicated, there was a considerable number<br />

of Tatar soldiers in his army when Selim landed on Kili shores. 1460 Nevertheless,<br />

Ottoman historians do not provide clear indication to this marriage.<br />

Ottoman sources unanimously record that despite the very successful<br />

achievements of Prince Selim in the Province of Trabzon, Bayezid II did not appreciate<br />

his efforts. The reason stemmed from domestic politics. Towards the end of the first<br />

decade of the sixteenth-century, Bayezid’s health deteriorated so much that he totally<br />

left the state affairs to his viziers. 1461 The most important issue discussed in the Porte<br />

was the determination of the successor of Bayezid. As all sources agreed, Bayezid and<br />

leading statesmen were openly in favor of Ahmed, the governor of Amasya. 1462 Idrīs-i<br />

Bitlisī records, for example, that in the last years of his reign, Bayezid’s health seriously<br />

deteriorated. Consequently, complete disarray in the state affairs became inevitable. At<br />

the end, leading statesmen were summoned and they decided to enthrone Ahmed during<br />

the lifetime of Bayezid. According to Idrīs, they preferred Ahmed because they had<br />

good relations with him. In this way they could save their posts in the post-Bayezid<br />

period. 1463<br />

It must have been because of this fact that Selim’s success was disregarded in<br />

Istanbul. Contemporary sources record that the central administration was favoring<br />

1460<br />

See, for example, FSH, p. 107. The archival evidence regarding Selim’s movement will be delineated<br />

in the following pages.<br />

1461<br />

See, for example, IDRS, p. 87; KPZ8b, p. 39; ANMB, pp. 181-2.<br />

1462<br />

KPZ’s account on the issue, for example, runs, “...Ol zamanda Tavāsī Ali Paşa vezir-i a’zam olub,<br />

rü’ūs-i hadem arasında sadr idi, ve Mustafa Paşa vezir-i sāni olub sāhib-i sā’ib-tedbīr, müşīr-i celīlü’lkadr<br />

idi. Ve sā’ir erkān u a’yānun ekseri kendü hevalarına teka’üd ve inzivalarına mülā’im oldığı ecilden<br />

merhūm Sultan Ahmede intisāb idüb, atası yirine pādişāh oldığın isterlerdi...” KPZ8b, p. 39. HSE writes<br />

in the same manner, “[Bayezid II] gönlünü Sultan Ahmed’den yana kaydırmış bulunması, padişahlık<br />

otağından lütuf yellerini onun emel bahçelerine doğru estirdikten başka, Ahmed’i veliahd edinmesi niyeti<br />

de kesinleşmiş gibi bulunuyordu.” HSE4, p. 11. ‘Ali, on the other hand, records an important detail: ‘the<br />

viziers were favoring Ahmed but begs of Rumelia and the Janissaries were favoring Selim.’ ALI, p. 934.<br />

1463<br />

IDRS, p. 87.<br />

431

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!