03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

actual kinship ties 109 . As Barfield delineates it, “The closer we get to the bottom ranks of<br />

any tribal system, the more the system relies on actual descent and affinal ties; the<br />

higher we go in the same structure, the more political its relationships become.” 110<br />

As genealogy serves as the pillar of the theory of tribal polity, the chief occupies<br />

the focus of this theory. The person of the chief stays at the top of the pyramid. He has<br />

three main functions: 1) organizing intra-tribal economy such as allotting pastures,<br />

determining migration routes, coordinating migrations of the tribe, 2) settling disputes<br />

within the tribe, 3) representing the tribe and safeguarding its benefits in relations with<br />

other tribes or states. 111 These functions also constitute the factors that lead to the<br />

emergence of leadership in a nomadic society. Namely, the need to allocate key sources,<br />

the establishing and regularizing of routes of pastoral migration, the need of certain<br />

order, the need for defense, the struggle for the livestock, pastures, and arable lands,<br />

migrations and wars, the desire of certain groups of nomads to subdue others,<br />

particularities of relations and interactions with the outside sedentary world requisite the<br />

accumulation of power in one hand. 112 The sources that the chief derives his power from<br />

are closely related to the cohesive forces that holds tribesmen together. As is already<br />

mentioned, one of those cohesive forces is genealogy.<br />

Lindner calls attention to another significant means of social solidarity in tribal<br />

organizations: common interest. As many other anthropologists, he regards genealogy as<br />

an “idiom or charters that nomads use to explain their history and politics” 113 , but never<br />

109 For a case study among Qashka’i Tribe in southwestern Iran see. Beck, “Tribes and the State in<br />

Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Iran”, p. 193.<br />

110 Barfield, p. 157.<br />

111 See for the case of Basseri, for example, Barth, pp. 75-76.<br />

112 Khazanov, Nomads and the Outside World, p. 148-9.<br />

113 Rudi Paul Lindner, “What was a Nomadic Tribe?”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol.<br />

24, no. 4, 1982, p. 696.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!