03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was the Persian bureaucracy running the administrative and fiscal affairs of the state.<br />

The latter was usually called ‘Tācik’ by the formers in a despising manner, while the<br />

word ‘Qizilbash’ connoted ‘single-minded, uneducated and uncultured rough men’<br />

among the bureaucratic elite. As it had been in the Ottoman case, the tribal mode of the<br />

polity here also lost the struggle against the bureaucratic imperial state. The sixteenth-<br />

century Safavid history, in essence, was indeed nothing other than the history of the<br />

tragic decline of the tribal politics, as well as the religious mentality and the way of<br />

practice accompanied, against the rising literacy based on the bureaucratic organization<br />

and religious proliferation. 1948<br />

The Safavid historians seem to agree upon the idea that until 1508, when Husayn<br />

Beg Lala was dismissed from the posts of vekālat and āmir al-umerā, the absolute<br />

qizilbash domination in the Safavid politics continued. From then on, the balance of<br />

power began to shift towards the Persian bureaucracy. However, the main turning point,<br />

in many aspects, was arguably the defeat of Çaldıran, which resulted in a sequence of<br />

fundamental changes in both international and domestic affairs of the Safavid State. As<br />

Savory states, “as a result of their defeat at Chāldirān, the Safavids were thrown on to<br />

the defensive in their long-drawn-out struggle with the Ottomans, and did not regain the<br />

initiative for the three-quarters of a century, until the reign of Shah ‘Abbās the<br />

Great.” 1949 The consequences of battle of Çaldıran for the Safavid state, however, were<br />

to be far beyond the military defeat or territorial loss. Although it marked a turning point<br />

in the rivalry of the two powers for the leadership in the Islamic world, perhaps a more<br />

1948 The analysis of the tribe-bureaucracy contest in the Safavid state is far beyond the scope of the present<br />

study. For a recent study of several aspects of the issue, see Kathryn Babayan, Mystics, Monarchs, and<br />

Messiahs. Cultural Landscapes of Early Modern Iran, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press, 2002.<br />

1949 Savory, Iran under the Safavids, p. 45.<br />

589

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!