03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tried to drown his sorrows by drunken debauches.” 1952 A Safavid chronicle describes his<br />

years after this defeat as follows: “He spent most of his time in hunting, or in the<br />

company of rosy-cheeked youths, quaffing goblets of purple wine, and listening to the<br />

strains of music and song.” 1953 A Venetian merchant records witnessing that in 1520,<br />

“on his second arrival in Tauris [Tabriz], Ismael committed a most disgraceful act, as he<br />

caused twelve of the most beautiful youths in the town to be taken to his place of<br />

Astibisti [Heşt Behişt] for him to work his wicked will upon them, and he gave them<br />

away one by one to his lords for the same purpose; a short time previously he had caused<br />

ten children of respectable men to be seized in like manner.” 1954<br />

On the other hand, this defeat equally damaged the relationship between the Shah<br />

and his disciples, and consequently influenced the ground of the Safavids’ claims of<br />

legitimacy for the power. The autocratic power of the Safavid Shahs is alleged to have<br />

three foundations: the first was derived from the ancient Persian theory of suzerainty<br />

which attributed divine rights to the king regarding him as a ‘shadow of God upon<br />

earth’. The second foundation stemmed from the Shi’ite belief of Mahdi; the Safavid<br />

shahs, by the help of the newly migrated shi’ite scholars (especially from Jabal ‘Amil),<br />

declared themselves as the representatives of the Hidden Imam, Mahdi. And last but not<br />

least, they were the ‘perfect guide’, mürşid-i kāmil, of the qizilbash disciples. 1955 During<br />

the preparation and formation period of the state, the most influential and functional<br />

instrument among these three foundations was, without doubt, the last one. Until the<br />

1952 Savory, Iran under the Safavids, pp. 46-7.<br />

1953 Khwurshāh b. Qubād al-Husaynī, Tārikh-i Īlchī-yi Nizāmshāh, Manuscript, British Museum, Add. 23,<br />

513, fol. 445a, recited in Roger Savory, “The Consolidation of Safawid Power in Persia”, Der Islam, 41,<br />

1965, p. 93.<br />

1954 “The Travels of a Merchant in Persia”, in NIT, p. 207.<br />

1955 See Roger M. Savory, “The Safavid State and Polity”, in Studies on Isfahan, Proceedings of the<br />

Isfahan Colloquium, 1974, Part I, ed. R. Holod=Iranian Studies, VII, Chestnut Hill, Mass., 1974, p. 184.<br />

591

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!