03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

synthesized at the cross-section of two separate lines of story: it was the interference of<br />

the ‘dream of Osman Beg and that of Shaykh Safī, one started in Söğüt and the other in<br />

Ardabil at the beginning of the fourteenth century. After following two separate - but<br />

increasingly interrelative – trajectories for one and a half century, two lines of story<br />

intersected in the Anatolian peninsula. And this intersection created one of the most<br />

unique religio-social – and also political and military during the formative period –<br />

identity of the Islamic world. Apart from the foremost actors of the two lines, the<br />

Ottomans and the Safavids, the common actors of both lines, on whom the present study<br />

focused, were Turkomans.<br />

Turkomans were composed of the nomadic-tribal units, each constituting a<br />

‘compact community’ separate from each other and from the sedentary societies.<br />

Chapter I delineated that the most differentiating feature of the compact communities<br />

lays in its high degree of communality and low degree of individuality. As a social<br />

entity, a nomadic tribe is more like a biological unit rather than a set of individuals.<br />

Individual, as long as one can speak of the concept of ‘individual’ in such communities,<br />

is simply an incomplete part of the community and can not sustain separately. When<br />

abstract concepts such as faith, ideology, and polity are taken into account, the<br />

boundaries between individuals and the community as a whole further diminish. Thus,<br />

this is why in a compact community the faith is a social issue rather than an individual<br />

experience. Similarly, polity is also a social entity but not a collective initiative of<br />

individuals; therefore, the tribe constitutes an ‘indivisible’ – but greater and more<br />

influential - political unit.<br />

It has been one of the major arguments of this thesis that the nomadic-tribes as<br />

compact communities and indivisible political units posed an uncompromising problem<br />

626

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!