03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

etreated rebels, to whom the soldiers around the pasha joined as well. Taking advantage<br />

of the situation Şahkulu led an assault on Karagöz Pasha, who was totally defensless,<br />

and incarcerated him. Upon losing their leader, the Ottoman troops scattered. After<br />

consulting the sipāhis of Teke 1288 , Şahkulu executed Karagöz Pasha outside the city. 1289<br />

Some words in the letter of the Ottoman spy Yusuf, who reported the defeat of<br />

Karagöz Pasha to the Porte, best explain the psychology of the folk in the region. He<br />

underscores, just like other reporters and spies, that the Porte should not underestimate<br />

the danger; each day numerous men of plunderer were gathering around him. The folk<br />

psychology was governed by the idea of revolution; thus the people of the region did not<br />

trust anyone. Yusuf warns the Porte that one should not compare them with other foes:<br />

“...mezkūr tāyifeyi zaīf etmek olmaz ve durmayub her gün yanlarına eşirradan adem<br />

cem’ oluyor. Vilayetin halkı inkılab üzre olub kimesneye itimad değildir. Elhasıl bu<br />

mel’unları sair a’dāya kıyas etmelü değildir. …” 1290<br />

It seems from this expression that Şahkulu managed to convince not only his<br />

adherents but also a considerable portion of the non-qizilbash population of the region<br />

on his claims. As indicated above his intention was not simply to plunder the area but he<br />

believed in repelling the Ottoman rule from the country and in establishing his own rule<br />

in the name of Shah Ismail. So the revolt of Şahkulu was intended as a revolutionary<br />

movement aiming to change the regime. 1291 As observed in Yusuf’s report, Şahkulu<br />

1288 See below footnote.<br />

1289 TSA, document E. 5035. Partly published in ULCY1, p. 62, footnote 11. Also consider TSA,<br />

document E. 5881; TNSB, p. 251. KPZ and ANMB narrates the events in the same manner. See KPZ8b,<br />

pp. 45-46; ANMB, p. 176-7. Also consider CLZ, p. 123; MNB, pp. 428-9.<br />

1290 TSA, document, E. 5881.<br />

1291 After narrating the death of Karagöz Pasha in Kütahya ANMB states, “...Çün memleket-gīrlik secdası<br />

dimağları cevfen-i makarr idinmişdi. Müşāhade itdikleri sūret bi-hasbi’z-zāhir ol ma’nāyı kendü za’m-ı<br />

fāsidlerince mukarrer idüb Anatolı Vilāyetini kabza-i tasarrufa getürdük deyu eşerinde bilürlerdi...”<br />

ANMB, p. 178.<br />

389

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!