03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the other hand, a relative religious, economic, and administrative autonomy against the<br />

interference of the Ottoman officials at least by the mid-seventeenth century.<br />

To the contrary of the Ottoman Administration’s will, however, this autonomy<br />

which granted a certain capacity of resistance to the absorbed heterodox elements<br />

resulted in the survival of Anatolian heresy under (relative) Bektashi protection.<br />

Following Linda Schatkowski-Schilcher’s analysis on the society of the eighteenth- and<br />

nineteenth-century Damascus 2037 , Faroqhi attempts to explain this autonomy and<br />

immunity of dervishes against the government with the phenomenon of ‘sufi estate’. The<br />

sufi groups, or tarikats, in the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Ottoman Empire were<br />

bodies with a definite membership and a well-defined internal structure. Thus it was not<br />

so easy to violate the autonomous sphere of a sufi organization and to remove one or<br />

more people from this ‘estate’ to the status of ordinary re’āya. 2038<br />

As far as the qizilbashes are concerned, however, one should further this<br />

analysis. Although it seems plausible to assume that the qizilbashes of Anatolia shifted<br />

their allegiance to Bektashi Order from the second half of the sixteenth century onwards,<br />

one may hardly claim that they became Bektashi. Rather, their affiliation to – or<br />

connection with - the order developed in a peculiar way. Most probably stemming from<br />

its dominant tribal character during the formation, or more accurately speaking<br />

‘synthesis’ period, the boundaries of the qizilbash identity in the Ottoman Anatolia were<br />

formed not only by the religious discourse but also by a vague ethnicity. As elucidated<br />

throughout the present study, during the formative period under Shaykh Junayd, Shaykh<br />

Haydar, and Shah Ismail, the qizilbash community mainly appeared as tribal, close-knit<br />

2037 Linda Schatkowski-Schilcher, Families in Politics. Damascus Factions and States of the 18th and<br />

19th Centuries, Stuttgart: Berliner Islamstudien, 2, 1985.<br />

2038 Faroqhi, “Conflict, Accommodation, and Long-Term Survival”, p. 182.<br />

619

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!