03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

servants to bring his own sword, which, when brought, he fastened with his own<br />

hands to the girdle of the child. Then he said “You may now depart.” Having<br />

recited Fātiha he entrusted the child to the two or three persons who had brought<br />

him in. when they had taken the child away, he made a sign to the young Arab to<br />

lead the dervish back to his caravan; and having brought him to it, said: “This is<br />

the caravan from which you were separated.” When Dede Muhammad saw the<br />

caravan he said: “Oh! Youth, tell me, for God’s sake, who that prince was and<br />

who the child?” He replied: “Did you not know that the prince whom you saw<br />

was no other than the Lord of the Age [The twelfth Imam]?” 836<br />

Before analyzing the content I would like to call attention to the author and<br />

authorship of the source. According to Ross, some details in the narration suggest that<br />

the anonymous author of this history must have participated in most of the events he<br />

recounts. Ross also deduces that he (the anonymous author) must be closely connected<br />

with the Safavids. 837 A close examination of the narration, indeed, reveals that the author<br />

was a sincere qizilbash. As for the time of completion, one might feel justified in<br />

supposing that it was completed soon after the accession of Tahmasp in 930 / 1524, for<br />

the work ends with a short account of the accession of Tahmasp. 838 According to<br />

Sarwar, however, the work was composed between 1540 and 1548. 839 Andrew H.<br />

Morton, on the other hand, identifies this work with Jahāngushā-yi khākān and suggests<br />

a 17th-century date of composition. 840 Whatever the date was, it appears as a clear fact<br />

that the aforesaid account should be regarded as a retrospective re-production of the<br />

ideological frame of Ismail’s huruj by qizilbash authorship. Although the above story is,<br />

836<br />

Ross Anonymous, pp. 329-331.<br />

837<br />

E. Denison Ross, “The Early Years of Shāh Isma’īl, Founder of the Safavī Dynasty”, Journal of the<br />

Royal Asiatic Society, p. 252. The author’s full name is unknown, but Ghulām Sarwar determines from an<br />

incomplete marginal note that it starts with Bijan. See Sarwar, History of Shah Isma’il Safawī, p. 9.<br />

838<br />

Ross, p. 250.<br />

839<br />

See Sarwar, p. 10.<br />

840<br />

See Morton, “The Date and Attribution of Ross Anonymous. Notes on a Persian History of Shah Isma’īl<br />

I”, History and Literature in Iran: Persian and Islamic Studies in Honour of P. W. Avery, ed. Charles<br />

Melville, Chambridge: Center for Middle Eastern Studies, 1990, pp. 179-212. Also consider his “The<br />

Early Years of Shah Isma’il in the Afzal al-tavārikh and Elsewhere”, in Safavid Persia. The History and<br />

Politics of an Islamic Society, ed., Charles Melville, London, New York, 1996, pp. 27-28.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!