03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zamanla akrabası demin dava etmekde hazer eylemeyeler. Emr-i şerifim budur<br />

ki ol asıl sufilerden her kim siyāseten salb oluna hiç bir zamanda anun demi<br />

hususunda olan dava mesmû’ olmaya. Şöyle ki atabe-i alem-penahımdan gelüb<br />

bir suretle teftişe hükm dahı alurlar ise, ol hükümle dahı amel olunmaya. Elbette<br />

elbette dutulan sufi siyaset içün salb olup emrüm yerine varmak gerekdür. 1015<br />

Another edict dated evāhir-i Zilhicce 906 (July 7-17, 1501) was addressed to<br />

Prince Ahmed, the governor of Amasya. It includes three orders, two of which were<br />

directly linked to the qizilbash affairs. The first is related to a spy report on the affairs of<br />

Ismail and Akkoyunlu that had already been sent by Ahmed to Istanbul. Ahmed reported<br />

that Shah Ismail resided on the other side of the river Kur; there appeared epidemic in<br />

farms of Shirvan; Akkoyunlu resided on this side of the river and controlled gateways.<br />

The central government orders Ahmed to collect further information on these affairs and<br />

to report to the Porte. 1016<br />

The second decree is quite interesting. It is stated in the decree that they (central<br />

government) received a letter from the governor of Karahisar. The governor reported in<br />

his letter that certain Zinnūn Beg among the begs of the East sent a messenger to him<br />

explaining Zinnūn’s request to take refuge in the Porte (āsitāne-i saādet). The central<br />

government states that Zinnūn’s request would be refused since they had warm relations<br />

sultan était entravée, au moins pour une part, par les règles en vigueur dans le milieu tribal.” See Veinstein<br />

“Les premières mesures”, p. 234. But his approach is open to criticism. It must be rather assessed within<br />

the framework of the Ottoman-Safavid political rivalry. As a matter of fact, we do not see such harsh<br />

measures against tribal groups in the other parts of the empire. In this case the judicial base of the Ottoman<br />

policy lays in the concept of rebel and heresy rather than tribal affairs.<br />

1015 See Ahkām Defteri, pp. 78-9, decree 281.<br />

1016 “Şimdiki hālde dergāh-ı mu’allāma mektub ve ādem gönderüb Yuraru Şark diyārına gönderilen<br />

ādemden biri gelüb: “Sufi tāifesi Kür suyınun öte kenarında oturub Şirvan vilayetinün ekin yörür<br />

ovalarında taun hastalığı vāki’ olub, Akkoyunlu bu canibde oturub memerrleri hıfz iderler” diyu<br />

bildürmüş, malum oldı. Eyle olsa gerekdür ki bundan böyle dahī dāim yarar ādemler gönderüb tecessüs<br />

itdürüb hakikat-ı hāl ne vechile zahir olursa yazub dergāh-ı ālem-penāhıma i’lām idesiz!” See Ahkām<br />

Defteri, p. 125, decree 453.<br />

312

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!