03.07.2013 Views

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ... - Bilkent University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

society; the attitude of the government was regarded as either as too harsh or entirely<br />

oppressing. Indeed, it must have been this discontent that forced Aşıkpaşazāde to add the<br />

last section of his history, which summarizes the deeds of Junayd. His question at the<br />

beginning of the section reveals the fact that a considerable number of people, possibly<br />

even among the high circles of Istanbul, were confused with the deportation of Safavid<br />

adherents, who seemed still to be well-regarded sufis. The answer of Aşıkpaşazāde aims<br />

exactly to resolve this question. He attempts to explain the essential change in the<br />

doctrinal basis of this mystic order in order to prove to his audience that the Order of<br />

Safaviyya was no more regarded as an ‘approved’ mystical path from the Islamic point<br />

of view. 1051<br />

5.4. <strong>THE</strong> KARAMAN UPRISING, 1500<br />

A certain Mustafa 1052 , pretending to be a member of Karaman dynasty, rose up against<br />

the Ottoman authority while Bayezid II was occupied with the conquest of coastal<br />

strongholds in Morea such as Lepanto, Modon, and Coron. The tribes of the Taş-eli<br />

region such as Turgutlu and Varsak immediately gathered around him. 1053 Aşıkpaşazāde<br />

declares that the actual reason of the uprising was the increasing taxes imposed over the<br />

region. Ottoman government commissioned a bureaucrat to re-register the tax sources of<br />

the province of Karaman in 906 / 1500-1. The new register (tahrir) doubly increased the<br />

administrative and military responsibilities of the timar holders while their allotted<br />

1051 APZ, p. 249.<br />

1052 Idris and ‘Ali gives his name as Đbrahim. “....vilāyet-i Qaraman’da Đbrahim nām bir mechūlü’n-nesebi<br />

mezmūmü’l-haseb nedir ki ‘Ben Qaraman-Oğlı Đshak Beğ’in ferzend-i reşidiyem’ diyu zuhur eyledi.” See<br />

ALI, p. 900. Also consider TNSB, p. 123, footnote 43. Solakzāde says his name was Mustafa and he was<br />

the son of Hacı Hamza, who was the son of Qaramanoğlu Đbrahim Bey. Müneccimbaşı, however, argues<br />

that Hacı Hamza was the son of Đbrahim Bey’s brother Mirzā Bey. Both of them agree on the fact that<br />

Mustafa had fled to Iranian lands during his infancy and grew there. See SLZ1, p. 429; MNB, p. 412.<br />

1053 KPZ8a, pp. 210-11.<br />

323

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!